2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

The rhetoric of Kekaumenos 1

Charlotte Roueché

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

Since their first appearance the Consilia et Narrationes ascribed to Kekaumenos have been warmly received, not least because of the simple directness of their style. As one scholar has observed, &s;it is dangerous to underestimate the rhetoricity of Kekaumenos&s;. Kekaumenos provides no encomia, since his gnomai are normally unattributed. As has been said, Robert Browning used the example of Kekaumenos when discussing Byzantine literacy. The Byzantine educational curriculum was that developed in the Graeco-Roman period. In the Byzantine period, the basic order of study remained the same; a propaideia in reading and writing, then the study of the language, based on the analysis of texts and then the study of rhetoric. In both the Roman and the Byzantine periods, therefore, money and geography have meant that many more young men have studied &s;grammar&s; than those who entered the next stage of rhetorical learning.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since their first appearance the Consilia et Narrationes ascribed to Kekaumenos have been warmly received, not least because of the simple directness of their style. As one scholar has observed, &s;it is dangerous to underestimate the rhetoricity of Kekaumenos&s;. Kekaumenos provides no encomia, since his gnomai are normally unattributed. As has been said, Robert Browning used the example of Kekaumenos when discussing Byzantine literacy. The Byzantine educational curriculum was that developed in the Graeco-Roman period. In the Byzantine period, the basic order of study remained the same; a propaideia in reading and writing, then the study of the language, based on the analysis of texts and then the study of rhetoric. In both the Roman and the Byzantine periods, therefore, money and geography have meant that many more young men have studied &s;grammar&s; than those who entered the next stage of rhetorical learning.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since their first appearance the Consilia et Narrationes ascribed to Kekaumenos have been warmly received, not least because of the simple directness of their style. As one scholar has observed, &s;it is dangerous to underestimate the rhetoricity of Kekaumenos&s;. Kekaumenos provides no encomia, since his gnomai are normally unattributed. As has been said, Robert Browning used the example of Kekaumenos when discussing Byzantine literacy. The Byzantine educational curriculum was that developed in the Graeco-Roman period. In the Byzantine period, the basic order of study remained the same; a propaideia in reading and writing, then the study of the language, based on the analysis of texts and then the study of rhetoric. In both the Roman and the Byzantine periods, therefore, money and geography have meant that many more young men have studied &s;grammar&s; than those who entered the next stage of rhetorical learning.

Key concepts: Rhetoric, Political science, Art, Philosophy, Linguistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The rhetoric of Kekaumenos 1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens