2018National Journal of Physiology Pharmacy and PharmacologyOpen access

Assessing prescriptions for potentially inappropriate medications using Beer's criteria in elderly in-patients at a tertiary care hospital

Shukrath Chandrappa, R Divya, Kavitha Rajarathna

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Background: The elderly population is growing rapidly worldwide. Many are suffering from multimorbidity. Inappropriate prescribing in the elderly can cause substantial morbidity and results in clinical and economic burden to patients and society at large. Gaining insight into physicians prescribing patterns to recognize prescribing problems is the fundamental first step in trying to improve the quality of prescribing. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the appropriateness of prescriptions using Beers criteria 2015. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted at a medicine in-patient department of a tertiary care hospital over a period of 3 months. All the in-patients aged above 60 years were included in the study. The World Health Organization core prescribing indicators were used to analyze the prescriptions. Potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM) were identified using the Beers criteria. Results: A total of 300 in-patient prescriptions were studied. Of these 178 (59.34%) were male patients. 222 (74%) were 6575 years age group. A total of 2175 drugs were prescribed. Average drug exposure per patient was 7.25. Based on 2015 Beers criteria, 86 (28.6%) of them had one or more PIM. Among 2175 prescribed drugs, 48 drugs were identified as drugs that generally should be avoided in older adults and 76 medications were to be used with caution in elderly. Conclusion: Polypharmacy and PIMs are prevalent. There is a need for guidelines for the use of drugs in the elderly, and further studies are needed on this issue. [Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2019; 9(2.000): 145-149]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: The elderly population is growing rapidly worldwide. Many are suffering from multimorbidity. Inappropriate prescribing in the elderly can cause substantial morbidity and results in clinical and economic burden to patients and society at large. Gaining insight into physicians prescribing patterns to recognize prescribing problems is the fundamental first step in trying to improve the quality of prescribing. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the appropriateness of prescriptions using Beers criteria 2015. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted at a medicine in-patient department of a tertiary care hospital over a period of 3 months. All the in-patients aged above 60 years were included in the study. The World Health Organization core prescribing indicators were used to analyze the prescriptions. Potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM) were identified using the Beers criteria. Results: A total of 300 in-patient prescriptions were studied. Of these 178 (59.34%) were male patients. 222 (74%) were 6575 years age group. A total of 2175 drugs were prescribed. Average drug exposure per patient was 7.25. Based on 2015 Beers criteria, 86 (28.6%) of them had one or more PIM. Among 2175 prescribed drugs, 48 drugs were identified as drugs that generally should be avoided in older adults and 76 medications were to be used with caution in elderly. Conclusion: Polypharmacy and PIMs are prevalent. There is a need for guidelines for the use of drugs in the elderly, and further studies are needed on this issue. [Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2019; 9(2.000): 145-149]

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: The elderly population is growing rapidly worldwide. Many are suffering from multimorbidity. Inappropriate prescribing in the elderly can cause substantial morbidity and results in clinical and economic burden to patients and society at large. Gaining insight into physicians prescribing patterns to recognize prescribing problems is the fundamental first step in trying to improve the quality of prescribing. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the appropriateness of prescriptions using Beers criteria 2015. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted at a medicine in-patient department of a tertiary care hospital over a period of 3 months. All the in-patients aged above 60 years were included in the study. The World Health Organization core prescribing indicators were used to analyze the prescriptions. Potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM) were identified using the Beers criteria. Results: A total of 300 in-patient prescriptions were studied. Of these 178 (59.34%) were male patients. 222 (74%) were 6575 years age group. A total of 2175 drugs were prescribed. Average drug exposure per patient was 7.25. Based on 2015 Beers criteria, 86 (28.6%) of them had one or more PIM. Among 2175 prescribed drugs, 48 drugs were identified as drugs that generally should be avoided in older adults and 76 medications were to be used with caution in elderly. Conclusion: Polypharmacy and PIMs are prevalent. There is a need for guidelines for the use of drugs in the elderly, and further studies are needed on this issue. [Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2019; 9(2.000): 145-149]

Key concepts: Tertiary care, Medical prescription, Medicine, Emergency medicine, Intensive care medicine, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessing prescriptions for potentially inappropriate medications using Beer's criteria in elderly in-patients at a tertiary care hospital — Research Paper | ScholarLens