2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Language Arts Education

Patricia H. Hinchey

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Among the many areas of education specifically targeted by recent educational reforms, language arts instruction has been one of the most intensely affected, in part because reading was one of the first targets of mandated high-stakes testing. Curricular change in response to the legislation has savaged not only language arts classrooms and teachers, but students as well. Numerous scholars have challenged the National Reading Panel report findings, and many critics further charge that, in any case, the findings are far narrower than the government often claims. Not surprisingly, teachers report that when a phonics approach stressing sound asks children to "read" a group of letters that may or may not add up to a real word, the children often try to impose sense within the nonsensical pedagogy. Generally, No Child Left Behind and Reading First have had an enormous, and enormously harmful, effect on literacy education, especially in early years.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Among the many areas of education specifically targeted by recent educational reforms, language arts instruction has been one of the most intensely affected, in part because reading was one of the first targets of mandated high-stakes testing. Curricular change in response to the legislation has savaged not only language arts classrooms and teachers, but students as well. Numerous scholars have challenged the National Reading Panel report findings, and many critics further charge that, in any case, the findings are far narrower than the government often claims. Not surprisingly, teachers report that when a phonics approach stressing sound asks children to "read" a group of letters that may or may not add up to a real word, the children often try to impose sense within the nonsensical pedagogy. Generally, No Child Left Behind and Reading First have had an enormous, and enormously harmful, effect on literacy education, especially in early years.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Among the many areas of education specifically targeted by recent educational reforms, language arts instruction has been one of the most intensely affected, in part because reading was one of the first targets of mandated high-stakes testing. Curricular change in response to the legislation has savaged not only language arts classrooms and teachers, but students as well. Numerous scholars have challenged the National Reading Panel report findings, and many critics further charge that, in any case, the findings are far narrower than the government often claims. Not surprisingly, teachers report that when a phonics approach stressing sound asks children to "read" a group of letters that may or may not add up to a real word, the children often try to impose sense within the nonsensical pedagogy. Generally, No Child Left Behind and Reading First have had an enormous, and enormously harmful, effect on literacy education, especially in early years.

Key concepts: The arts, Sociology, Mathematics education, Psychology, Visual arts, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Language Arts Education — Research Paper | ScholarLens