2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Sign language: the language of the Deaf community

Bruce M. Rowe, Diane P. Levine

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter reviews the ASL into the following points: First, the fact that deaf children in a signing environment learn manual-visual modes of communication as easily and in a similar pattern as hearing children learn speech indicates that language and speech are not the same thing. Speech is one way to convey linguistic competence; signing is another. Second, the drive to communicate linguistically is exceedingly strong. When one pathway of linguistic delivery is closed, humans will find another. Third, the basic principles of phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics are remarkably similar for signing and oral language. Sign language structure is based on variations in several parameters. These include hand-shape, location of the sign, movement of the sign, palm orientation, the region of the hand that contacts the body, the orientation of the hands with respect to each other, and non-manual signals. Using these parameters, morphemes, minimal pairs, clauses, and sentences can be formed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter reviews the ASL into the following points: First, the fact that deaf children in a signing environment learn manual-visual modes of communication as easily and in a similar pattern as hearing children learn speech indicates that language and speech are not the same thing. Speech is one way to convey linguistic competence; signing is another. Second, the drive to communicate linguistically is exceedingly strong. When one pathway of linguistic delivery is closed, humans will find another. Third, the basic principles of phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics are remarkably similar for signing and oral language. Sign language structure is based on variations in several parameters. These include hand-shape, location of the sign, movement of the sign, palm orientation, the region of the hand that contacts the body, the orientation of the hands with respect to each other, and non-manual signals. Using these parameters, morphemes, minimal pairs, clauses, and sentences can be formed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter reviews the ASL into the following points: First, the fact that deaf children in a signing environment learn manual-visual modes of communication as easily and in a similar pattern as hearing children learn speech indicates that language and speech are not the same thing. Speech is one way to convey linguistic competence; signing is another. Second, the drive to communicate linguistically is exceedingly strong. When one pathway of linguistic delivery is closed, humans will find another. Third, the basic principles of phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics are remarkably similar for signing and oral language. Sign language structure is based on variations in several parameters. These include hand-shape, location of the sign, movement of the sign, palm orientation, the region of the hand that contacts the body, the orientation of the hands with respect to each other, and non-manual signals. Using these parameters, morphemes, minimal pairs, clauses, and sentences can be formed.

Key concepts: Sign language, Linguistics, Deaf community, Computer science, Manually coded language, Language interpretation, Sign (mathematics), Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sign language: the language of the Deaf community — Research Paper | ScholarLens