2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluating military ethics education

George Wilkes

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter examines the application of different evaluation tools: more subjective, personal evaluation by teachers personally familiar with their students to assist in vocational development, more collective or objective means, including external reviews, to address the high risks of massive ethical and public relations failures in the field. It discusses the different approaches to vocational and situational preparedness taken across military ethics and ethics education programmes. The chapter also examines arguments for pursuing different options for evaluation in the face of factors which make evaluation of ethical preparedness particularly difficult. It concludes with reflections on the interests, challenges and opportunities involved in focusing either on teacher or on external evaluations, or alternatively in combining the different examination resources.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter examines the application of different evaluation tools: more subjective, personal evaluation by teachers personally familiar with their students to assist in vocational development, more collective or objective means, including external reviews, to address the high risks of massive ethical and public relations failures in the field. It discusses the different approaches to vocational and situational preparedness taken across military ethics and ethics education programmes. The chapter also examines arguments for pursuing different options for evaluation in the face of factors which make evaluation of ethical preparedness particularly difficult. It concludes with reflections on the interests, challenges and opportunities involved in focusing either on teacher or on external evaluations, or alternatively in combining the different examination resources.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter examines the application of different evaluation tools: more subjective, personal evaluation by teachers personally familiar with their students to assist in vocational development, more collective or objective means, including external reviews, to address the high risks of massive ethical and public relations failures in the field. It discusses the different approaches to vocational and situational preparedness taken across military ethics and ethics education programmes. The chapter also examines arguments for pursuing different options for evaluation in the face of factors which make evaluation of ethical preparedness particularly difficult. It concludes with reflections on the interests, challenges and opportunities involved in focusing either on teacher or on external evaluations, or alternatively in combining the different examination resources.

Key concepts: Engineering ethics, Political science, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluating military ethics education — Research Paper | ScholarLens