2016•Open Research (University of Surrey)Requires access

The Professional Ethics of U.S. Tax Treaty Interpretation

Bret N. Bogenschneider

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The use of tax treaties to obtain Double Non-Taxation for multinational firms as part of aggressive tax avoidance planning is not always ethical conduct for U.S. tax professionals. Under the guidance of the OECD, international standards of tax treaty practice are trending toward substantive methods of interpretation more typical of U.S. tax treaty drafting and interpretation. In a growing number of cases, the use of formalist planning techniques applying tax treaties without a substantive review may not constitute ethical attorney conduct. The interpretational methods underlying the use of tax treaties to obtain Double Non-Taxation are explained in detail. Although tax treaty interpretation is an art and not a science, thus rendering wide discretion to the tax planner, there are ethical boundaries in using tax treaties to achieve Double Non-Taxation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The use of tax treaties to obtain Double Non-Taxation for multinational firms as part of aggressive tax avoidance planning is not always ethical conduct for U.S. tax professionals. Under the guidance of the OECD, international standards of tax treaty practice are trending toward substantive methods of interpretation more typical of U.S. tax treaty drafting and interpretation. In a growing number of cases, the use of formalist planning techniques applying tax treaties without a substantive review may not constitute ethical attorney conduct. The interpretational methods underlying the use of tax treaties to obtain Double Non-Taxation are explained in detail. Although tax treaty interpretation is an art and not a science, thus rendering wide discretion to the tax planner, there are ethical boundaries in using tax treaties to achieve Double Non-Taxation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The use of tax treaties to obtain Double Non-Taxation for multinational firms as part of aggressive tax avoidance planning is not always ethical conduct for U.S. tax professionals. Under the guidance of the OECD, international standards of tax treaty practice are trending toward substantive methods of interpretation more typical of U.S. tax treaty drafting and interpretation. In a growing number of cases, the use of formalist planning techniques applying tax treaties without a substantive review may not constitute ethical attorney conduct. The interpretational methods underlying the use of tax treaties to obtain Double Non-Taxation are explained in detail. Although tax treaty interpretation is an art and not a science, thus rendering wide discretion to the tax planner, there are ethical boundaries in using tax treaties to achieve Double Non-Taxation.

Key concepts: Tax treaty, Interpretation (philosophy), Double taxation, Direct tax, Treaty, International taxation, Tax planning, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Professional Ethics of U.S. Tax Treaty Interpretation — Research Paper | ScholarLens