2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Impact of Battery Performance on Total Cost of Ownership for Electric Drive Vehicle

Panos D. Prevedouros, Lambros Mitropoulos

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The development of technologies and economies of scale has decreased battery cost for electric vehicle powertrains substantially in the last decade. However, electric vehicles are still pricier compared to vehicles with conventional powertrains. Incentives that promote vehicle electrification for cleaner and more sustainable urban mobility should rely on a holistic cost analysis that considers the life cycle costs of different vehicle technologies. This paper presents a method that estimates the direct Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for different electric vehicle powertrains. The TCO, which include direct and indirect costs, is estimated for three representative urban light duty vehicles: Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV), Electric Vehicle (EV), and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV). The TCO includes the present value of: 1) Vehicle retail cost including tax, 2) Lifetime operation cost from the time of vehicle purchase to the time of scrapping, including fueling, maintenance, taxes, insurance, registration and licensing costs, 3) Battery replacement cost, and 4) Time cost. Battery life expectancy is estimated by considering wear data. The results, which are based on vehicle technology characteristics and driver behavior, showed that the TCO for United States, showed that the TCO for EV and PHEV is higher by 24% and 36%, respectively, compared to the HEV. The method provides a better understanding of overall vehicle performance; it facilitates comparisons and supports policies for improved urban mobility.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The development of technologies and economies of scale has decreased battery cost for electric vehicle powertrains substantially in the last decade. However, electric vehicles are still pricier compared to vehicles with conventional powertrains. Incentives that promote vehicle electrification for cleaner and more sustainable urban mobility should rely on a holistic cost analysis that considers the life cycle costs of different vehicle technologies. This paper presents a method that estimates the direct Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for different electric vehicle powertrains. The TCO, which include direct and indirect costs, is estimated for three representative urban light duty vehicles: Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV), Electric Vehicle (EV), and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV). The TCO includes the present value of: 1) Vehicle retail cost including tax, 2) Lifetime operation cost from the time of vehicle purchase to the time of scrapping, including fueling, maintenance, taxes, insurance, registration and licensing costs, 3) Battery replacement cost, and 4) Time cost. Battery life expectancy is estimated by considering wear data. The results, which are based on vehicle technology characteristics and driver behavior, showed that the TCO for United States, showed that the TCO for EV and PHEV is higher by 24% and 36%, respectively, compared to the HEV. The method provides a better understanding of overall vehicle performance; it facilitates comparisons and supports policies for improved urban mobility.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The development of technologies and economies of scale has decreased battery cost for electric vehicle powertrains substantially in the last decade. However, electric vehicles are still pricier compared to vehicles with conventional powertrains. Incentives that promote vehicle electrification for cleaner and more sustainable urban mobility should rely on a holistic cost analysis that considers the life cycle costs of different vehicle technologies. This paper presents a method that estimates the direct Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for different electric vehicle powertrains. The TCO, which include direct and indirect costs, is estimated for three representative urban light duty vehicles: Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV), Electric Vehicle (EV), and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV). The TCO includes the present value of: 1) Vehicle retail cost including tax, 2) Lifetime operation cost from the time of vehicle purchase to the time of scrapping, including fueling, maintenance, taxes, insurance, registration and licensing costs, 3) Battery replacement cost, and 4) Time cost. Battery life expectancy is estimated by considering wear data. The results, which are based on vehicle technology characteristics and driver behavior, showed that the TCO for United States, showed that the TCO for EV and PHEV is higher by 24% and 36%, respectively, compared to the HEV. The method provides a better understanding of overall vehicle performance; it facilitates comparisons and supports policies for improved urban mobility.

Key concepts: Total cost of ownership, Powertrain, Electric vehicle, Automotive engineering, Battery (electricity), Electrification, Battery electric vehicle, Total cost

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impact of Battery Performance on Total Cost of Ownership for Electric Drive Vehicle — Research Paper | ScholarLens