2018Angewandte Chemie International EditionOpen access

Transformation of Imine Cages into Hydrocarbon Cages

Tobias H. G. Schick, Jochen C. Lauer, Frank Röminger, Michael Mastalerz

Open full text 73 citations

Abstract

Abstract In contrast to organic cages which are formed by exploiting dynamic covalent chemistry, such as boronic ester cages, imine cages, or disulfide cages, those with a fully carbonaceous backbone are rarer. With the exception of alkyne metathesis based approaches, the vast majority of hydrocarbon cages need to be synthesized by kinetically controlled bond formation. This strategy implies a multiple step synthesis and no correction mechanism in the final macrocyclization step, both of which are responsible for low overall yields. Whereas for smaller cages the intrinsic drawbacks are not always obvious, larger cages are seldom synthesized in yields beyond a few tenths of a percent. Presented herein is a three‐step method to convert imine cages into hydrocarbon cages. The method has been successfully applied to even larger structures such as derivatives of C 72 H 72 , an unknown cage suggested by Fritz Vögtle more than 20 years ago.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In contrast to organic cages which are formed by exploiting dynamic covalent chemistry, such as boronic ester cages, imine cages, or disulfide cages, those with a fully carbonaceous backbone are rarer. With the exception of alkyne metathesis based approaches, the vast majority of hydrocarbon cages need to be synthesized by kinetically controlled bond formation. This strategy implies a multiple step synthesis and no correction mechanism in the final macrocyclization step, both of which are responsible for low overall yields. Whereas for smaller cages the intrinsic drawbacks are not always obvious, larger cages are seldom synthesized in yields beyond a few tenths of a percent. Presented herein is a three‐step method to convert imine cages into hydrocarbon cages. The method has been successfully applied to even larger structures such as derivatives of C 72 H 72 , an unknown cage suggested by Fritz Vögtle more than 20 years ago.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 73 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In contrast to organic cages which are formed by exploiting dynamic covalent chemistry, such as boronic ester cages, imine cages, or disulfide cages, those with a fully carbonaceous backbone are rarer. With the exception of alkyne metathesis based approaches, the vast majority of hydrocarbon cages need to be synthesized by kinetically controlled bond formation. This strategy implies a multiple step synthesis and no correction mechanism in the final macrocyclization step, both of which are responsible for low overall yields. Whereas for smaller cages the intrinsic drawbacks are not always obvious, larger cages are seldom synthesized in yields beyond a few tenths of a percent. Presented herein is a three‐step method to convert imine cages into hydrocarbon cages. The method has been successfully applied to even larger structures such as derivatives of C 72 H 72 , an unknown cage suggested by Fritz Vögtle more than 20 years ago.

Key concepts: Imine, Dynamic covalent chemistry, Covalent bond, Chemistry, Hydrocarbon, Metathesis, Alkyne, Cage

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transformation of Imine Cages into Hydrocarbon Cages — Research Paper | ScholarLens