2018•PsychophysiologyRequires access

An ERP study of cross‐modal rhyming: Influences of phonology and orthography

Priya Mitra, Donna Coch

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

In a cross-modal rhyming study with visual pseudoword primes and auditory word targets, we found a typical ERP rhyming effect such that nonrhyming targets elicited a larger N400/N450 than rhyming targets. An orthographic effect was also apparent in the same 350- to 600-ms epoch as the phonological effect: The rhyming effect for targets with rime orthography that did not match their primes' (e.g., tain-"sane") was smaller over the left hemisphere than the rhyming effect for targets with rime orthography that did match their primes' (e.g., nain-"gain"), although the spellings of the auditory word targets were never explicitly shown. Our results indicate that this cross-modal ERP rhyming effect indexes both phonological and orthographic processing-for auditory stimuli for which no orthography is presented in the task. This pattern of findings is consistent with the notion of coactivation of sublexical orthography and phonology in fluent adult readers as they both read and listen.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a cross-modal rhyming study with visual pseudoword primes and auditory word targets, we found a typical ERP rhyming effect such that nonrhyming targets elicited a larger N400/N450 than rhyming targets. An orthographic effect was also apparent in the same 350- to 600-ms epoch as the phonological effect: The rhyming effect for targets with rime orthography that did not match their primes' (e.g., tain-"sane") was smaller over the left hemisphere than the rhyming effect for targets with rime orthography that did match their primes' (e.g., nain-"gain"), although the spellings of the auditory word targets were never explicitly shown. Our results indicate that this cross-modal ERP rhyming effect indexes both phonological and orthographic processing-for auditory stimuli for which no orthography is presented in the task. This pattern of findings is consistent with the notion of coactivation of sublexical orthography and phonology in fluent adult readers as they both read and listen.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a cross-modal rhyming study with visual pseudoword primes and auditory word targets, we found a typical ERP rhyming effect such that nonrhyming targets elicited a larger N400/N450 than rhyming targets. An orthographic effect was also apparent in the same 350- to 600-ms epoch as the phonological effect: The rhyming effect for targets with rime orthography that did not match their primes' (e.g., tain-"sane") was smaller over the left hemisphere than the rhyming effect for targets with rime orthography that did match their primes' (e.g., nain-"gain"), although the spellings of the auditory word targets were never explicitly shown. Our results indicate that this cross-modal ERP rhyming effect indexes both phonological and orthographic processing-for auditory stimuli for which no orthography is presented in the task. This pattern of findings is consistent with the notion of coactivation of sublexical orthography and phonology in fluent adult readers as they both read and listen.

Key concepts: Orthography, Pseudoword, Psychology, Phonology, Hard rime, N400, Linguistics, Rhyme

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An ERP study of cross‐modal rhyming: Influences of phonology and orthography — Research Paper | ScholarLens