2018Unpublished venueRequires access

What Is Feminism?

Rosalind Delmar

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

There are many, feminist and non-feminist alike, for whom the question &s;what is feminism?&s; has little meaning. The content of terms like &s;feminism&s; and &s;feminist&s; seems self-evident, something that can be taken for granted. It has become an obstacle to understanding feminism, in its diversity and in its differences, and in its specificity as well. Histories of feminism which treat feminism as social movement tend to concentrate on chronicling the vicissitudes of that movement and subordinate any exploration of the intellectual content of feminism to that main purpose. The exploration of feminist history is severely limited if the appearance of the social movement is assumed to be feminism&s;s apotheosis and privileged form. Feminism&s;s fascination with women is also the condition of the easy slippage from &s;feminist&s; to &s;woman&s; and back: the feminist becomes the representative of &s;woman&s;, just as &s;feminist history&s; becomes the same as &s;women&s;s history&s; and so on.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There are many, feminist and non-feminist alike, for whom the question &s;what is feminism?&s; has little meaning. The content of terms like &s;feminism&s; and &s;feminist&s; seems self-evident, something that can be taken for granted. It has become an obstacle to understanding feminism, in its diversity and in its differences, and in its specificity as well. Histories of feminism which treat feminism as social movement tend to concentrate on chronicling the vicissitudes of that movement and subordinate any exploration of the intellectual content of feminism to that main purpose. The exploration of feminist history is severely limited if the appearance of the social movement is assumed to be feminism&s;s apotheosis and privileged form. Feminism&s;s fascination with women is also the condition of the easy slippage from &s;feminist&s; to &s;woman&s; and back: the feminist becomes the representative of &s;woman&s;, just as &s;feminist history&s; becomes the same as &s;women&s;s history&s; and so on.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There are many, feminist and non-feminist alike, for whom the question &s;what is feminism?&s; has little meaning. The content of terms like &s;feminism&s; and &s;feminist&s; seems self-evident, something that can be taken for granted. It has become an obstacle to understanding feminism, in its diversity and in its differences, and in its specificity as well. Histories of feminism which treat feminism as social movement tend to concentrate on chronicling the vicissitudes of that movement and subordinate any exploration of the intellectual content of feminism to that main purpose. The exploration of feminist history is severely limited if the appearance of the social movement is assumed to be feminism&s;s apotheosis and privileged form. Feminism&s;s fascination with women is also the condition of the easy slippage from &s;feminist&s; to &s;woman&s; and back: the feminist becomes the representative of &s;woman&s;, just as &s;feminist history&s; becomes the same as &s;women&s;s history&s; and so on.

Key concepts: Feminism, Sociology, Gender studies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What Is Feminism? — Research Paper | ScholarLens