2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Positivist or Non-Positivist Rule of Law?

Lech Morawski

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This chapter distinguishes two components: a substantial one, that is the level of institutions and rights which a legal order must provide in order to guarantee the implementation of the rule of law; and a procedural one, that is the level of those norms which determine how the substantial institutions and rights operate or function in a legal system. It focuses on procedural problems. The chapter explores the first conception positivistic because it was created in its most mature and comprehensive form by Legal Positivism in the nineteenth century. It reviews the kind of critique which refers to the fact that the positivistic rule of law does not meet rationality requirements of modern interventionist states and the ideology of the welfare state. The chapter considers the problem of the rule of law in Poland after the collapse of Communism, and characterizes the use of this concept in the communist period.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter distinguishes two components: a substantial one, that is the level of institutions and rights which a legal order must provide in order to guarantee the implementation of the rule of law; and a procedural one, that is the level of those norms which determine how the substantial institutions and rights operate or function in a legal system. It focuses on procedural problems. The chapter explores the first conception positivistic because it was created in its most mature and comprehensive form by Legal Positivism in the nineteenth century. It reviews the kind of critique which refers to the fact that the positivistic rule of law does not meet rationality requirements of modern interventionist states and the ideology of the welfare state. The chapter considers the problem of the rule of law in Poland after the collapse of Communism, and characterizes the use of this concept in the communist period.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter distinguishes two components: a substantial one, that is the level of institutions and rights which a legal order must provide in order to guarantee the implementation of the rule of law; and a procedural one, that is the level of those norms which determine how the substantial institutions and rights operate or function in a legal system. It focuses on procedural problems. The chapter explores the first conception positivistic because it was created in its most mature and comprehensive form by Legal Positivism in the nineteenth century. It reviews the kind of critique which refers to the fact that the positivistic rule of law does not meet rationality requirements of modern interventionist states and the ideology of the welfare state. The chapter considers the problem of the rule of law in Poland after the collapse of Communism, and characterizes the use of this concept in the communist period.

Key concepts: Positivism, Legal positivism, Epistemology, Political science, Law, Sociology, Philosophy, Comparative law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Positivist or Non-Positivist Rule of Law? — Research Paper | ScholarLens