PSX-21 Influence of estrous synchronization on herd calving distribution and weaning weight.
Julie Walker, George A. Perry, Jerica J J Rich, Emmalee J. Northrop, Stuart D. Perkins, T. M. Grussing, Warren C Rusche
Abstract
Julie Walker, George A. Perry, Jerica J J Rich, Emmalee J. Northrop, Stuart D. Perkins, T. M. Grussing, Warren C Rusche
Abstract
Reproductive efficiency is critical for profitability in cow-calf operations, and age of calf is the largest factor that affects weaning weight. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the use of estrous synchronization and/or AI on calving distribution and weaning weight. Beef heifers and cows (n=962) in 11 herds were randomly assigned to one of three of the following treatments (two treatments/herd): 1) bulls were introduced on day 1 of the breeding season, 2) cows had an intravaginal progesterone device inserted for seven days before bulls were introduced, or 3) cows were synchronized with the 7-d CO-Synch+CIDR protocol and artificially inseminated followed by bull introduction 10 d later. Calving distribution was determined by actual birthdates. A subset of calves were weighed at weaning. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS to test the effects of synchronization and/or AI on calving distribution, average daily gain, and weaning weights. Herd was included as a random variable. Synchronization resulted in more calves born from d 1–10 (P<0.001; 44% vs 24%). Non synchronized cows had a greater (P<0.05) number of calves born between d 11–21 (30% vs 20%) and d 22–42 (30% vs 21%). Overall there was no difference (P=0.95) in the percentage of cows that calved. When adjusted to a common age calf weaning weights were not affected by synchronization (P=0.74) or breeding method (P=0.20). However, AI sired calves had greater ADG compared to natural service (P<0.05; 1.27 ± 0.03 vs 1.23 ± 0.03 kg/d), and male calves were 10 kg heavier at weaning than female calves (P<0.05). In summary, estrous synchronization increased the proportion of cows calving earlier, and when weaning occurs on a common day this will increase pounds of calf weaned. In addition, calves from AI’ed cows had improved ADG.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Reproductive efficiency is critical for profitability in cow-calf operations, and age of calf is the largest factor that affects weaning weight. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the use of estrous synchronization and/or AI on calving distribution and weaning weight. Beef heifers and cows (n=962) in 11 herds were randomly assigned to one of three of the following treatments (two treatments/herd): 1) bulls were introduced on day 1 of the breeding season, 2) cows had an intravaginal progesterone device inserted for seven days before bulls were introduced, or 3) cows were synchronized with the 7-d CO-Synch+CIDR protocol and artificially inseminated followed by bull introduction 10 d later. Calving distribution was determined by actual birthdates. A subset of calves were weighed at weaning. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS to test the effects of synchronization and/or AI on calving distribution, average daily gain, and weaning weights. Herd was included as a random variable. Synchronization resulted in more calves born from d 1–10 (P<0.001; 44% vs 24%). Non synchronized cows had a greater (P<0.05) number of calves born between d 11–21 (30% vs 20%) and d 22–42 (30% vs 21%). Overall there was no difference (P=0.95) in the percentage of cows that calved. When adjusted to a common age calf weaning weights were not affected by synchronization (P=0.74) or breeding method (P=0.20). However, AI sired calves had greater ADG compared to natural service (P<0.05; 1.27 ± 0.03 vs 1.23 ± 0.03 kg/d), and male calves were 10 kg heavier at weaning than female calves (P<0.05). In summary, estrous synchronization increased the proportion of cows calving earlier, and when weaning occurs on a common day this will increase pounds of calf weaned. In addition, calves from AI’ed cows had improved ADG.
Key concepts: Ice calving, Herd, Weaning, Animal science, Estrous cycle, Biology, Estrus synchronization, Beef cattle