2017The Encyclopedia of Juvenile Delinquency and JusticeRequires access

G raham v . F lorida

Melanie K. Worsley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

InGraham v. Florida, the US Supreme Court addressed the application of the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment in cases involving juvenile offenders. The Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits the government in juvenile offender cases from imposing a lifetime sentence without the possibility of parole for nonhomicide crimes. TheGrahamCourt's Eighth Amendment analysis is noteworthy because for the first time the Court applied a categorical rule to a nondeath penalty case. TheGrahamdecision is also noteworthy because the Court inMiller v. Alabamaused theGrahamrationale to create a categorical rule prohibiting the imposition of mandatory lifetime sentences without the possibility of parole in homicide cases involving juvenile offenders.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

InGraham v. Florida, the US Supreme Court addressed the application of the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment in cases involving juvenile offenders. The Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits the government in juvenile offender cases from imposing a lifetime sentence without the possibility of parole for nonhomicide crimes. TheGrahamCourt's Eighth Amendment analysis is noteworthy because for the first time the Court applied a categorical rule to a nondeath penalty case. TheGrahamdecision is also noteworthy because the Court inMiller v. Alabamaused theGrahamrationale to create a categorical rule prohibiting the imposition of mandatory lifetime sentences without the possibility of parole in homicide cases involving juvenile offenders.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

InGraham v. Florida, the US Supreme Court addressed the application of the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment in cases involving juvenile offenders. The Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits the government in juvenile offender cases from imposing a lifetime sentence without the possibility of parole for nonhomicide crimes. TheGrahamCourt's Eighth Amendment analysis is noteworthy because for the first time the Court applied a categorical rule to a nondeath penalty case. TheGrahamdecision is also noteworthy because the Court inMiller v. Alabamaused theGrahamrationale to create a categorical rule prohibiting the imposition of mandatory lifetime sentences without the possibility of parole in homicide cases involving juvenile offenders.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Punishment (psychology), Government (linguistics), Political science, Criminology, Sociology, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
G raham v . F lorida — Research Paper | ScholarLens