2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

Ideology as Social Criticism

Kenneth R. Minogue

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The ideologist first distinguishes himself from the generality of mankind in his role as a critic of society. Ideology claims to be an unusually deep or radical form of criticism. The ideological criticism operates by focusing attention upon the one aspect of power, thus conveying that consumers of news are victims of that power. This assumption of passivity is the counterpart of the premise already mentioned: ideological criticism rejects the moral stance as unreal. There can be no doubt that criticism of society couched in a language of philosophical fundamentalism is intellectually more impressive than the rough expedients of the politicians. Social criticism is thus a pathology in which each abuse is taken to reveal one or other model of oppression. Ideological criticism thus uses specific evils in modern life in order to generate a pure model of domination. Social criticism, then, is guided more strongly by its censorious thrust than by its concern with truth.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The ideologist first distinguishes himself from the generality of mankind in his role as a critic of society. Ideology claims to be an unusually deep or radical form of criticism. The ideological criticism operates by focusing attention upon the one aspect of power, thus conveying that consumers of news are victims of that power. This assumption of passivity is the counterpart of the premise already mentioned: ideological criticism rejects the moral stance as unreal. There can be no doubt that criticism of society couched in a language of philosophical fundamentalism is intellectually more impressive than the rough expedients of the politicians. Social criticism is thus a pathology in which each abuse is taken to reveal one or other model of oppression. Ideological criticism thus uses specific evils in modern life in order to generate a pure model of domination. Social criticism, then, is guided more strongly by its censorious thrust than by its concern with truth.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The ideologist first distinguishes himself from the generality of mankind in his role as a critic of society. Ideology claims to be an unusually deep or radical form of criticism. The ideological criticism operates by focusing attention upon the one aspect of power, thus conveying that consumers of news are victims of that power. This assumption of passivity is the counterpart of the premise already mentioned: ideological criticism rejects the moral stance as unreal. There can be no doubt that criticism of society couched in a language of philosophical fundamentalism is intellectually more impressive than the rough expedients of the politicians. Social criticism is thus a pathology in which each abuse is taken to reveal one or other model of oppression. Ideological criticism thus uses specific evils in modern life in order to generate a pure model of domination. Social criticism, then, is guided more strongly by its censorious thrust than by its concern with truth.

Key concepts: Ideology, Criticism, Social criticism, Sociology, Political science, Politics, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ideology as Social Criticism — Research Paper | ScholarLens