2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

Empirical Research Design

Magda Abou-Seada, Magdy Gamal Abdel-Kader

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter presents the empirical research design of the study. The empirical study aims at finding out about the approach followed by auditors in their evaluation of evidence and whether they follow a belief revision approach and the benefits of employing such an approach. The study aims at finding out about the factors affecting auditors&s; evaluation of evidence. The empirical study depends on two methodologies; a survey research and an experimental study. Survey research includes mail questionnaires, personal interviews, and telephone interviews. Experimental study depends on the use of laboratory experiments to address the issue of comparing the belief revision approach to the actual approach followed by auditors in their search for and evaluation of evidence. The belief revision approach has been operationalised through the experimental instrument by asking the participants to form an initial expectation about the materiality of the debtors after reading the background information.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter presents the empirical research design of the study. The empirical study aims at finding out about the approach followed by auditors in their evaluation of evidence and whether they follow a belief revision approach and the benefits of employing such an approach. The study aims at finding out about the factors affecting auditors&s; evaluation of evidence. The empirical study depends on two methodologies; a survey research and an experimental study. Survey research includes mail questionnaires, personal interviews, and telephone interviews. Experimental study depends on the use of laboratory experiments to address the issue of comparing the belief revision approach to the actual approach followed by auditors in their search for and evaluation of evidence. The belief revision approach has been operationalised through the experimental instrument by asking the participants to form an initial expectation about the materiality of the debtors after reading the background information.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter presents the empirical research design of the study. The empirical study aims at finding out about the approach followed by auditors in their evaluation of evidence and whether they follow a belief revision approach and the benefits of employing such an approach. The study aims at finding out about the factors affecting auditors&s; evaluation of evidence. The empirical study depends on two methodologies; a survey research and an experimental study. Survey research includes mail questionnaires, personal interviews, and telephone interviews. Experimental study depends on the use of laboratory experiments to address the issue of comparing the belief revision approach to the actual approach followed by auditors in their search for and evaluation of evidence. The belief revision approach has been operationalised through the experimental instrument by asking the participants to form an initial expectation about the materiality of the debtors after reading the background information.

Key concepts: Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Empirical Research Design — Research Paper | ScholarLens