2016Unpublished venueRequires access

The economics of research

David Tyfield

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter illustrates the difference critical realism makes, regarding formulation of a critical, explanatory political economy of research and innovation through engagement with the evolutionary economics of innovation. The school of thought that is variously called innovation studies or the evolutionary economics of innovation (EEI) has contributed most to current understanding of the processes of technological change and innovation. The neo-Gramscian perspective places politics as constitutive of technological and economic change in the form of spatio-temporal fixes and modes of regularisation and societalisation that constitute the settlement of a political economic space. C. Perez also stresses the importance of politics in the setting of techno economic trajectories and the mutual shaping&s; of politics and technology. Economics of Techn(olog)ical Change (ETC) thus carefully avoids the neoclassical errors of reifying economic states as static equilibria, but it necessarily reifies the processes and trajectories it identifies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter illustrates the difference critical realism makes, regarding formulation of a critical, explanatory political economy of research and innovation through engagement with the evolutionary economics of innovation. The school of thought that is variously called innovation studies or the evolutionary economics of innovation (EEI) has contributed most to current understanding of the processes of technological change and innovation. The neo-Gramscian perspective places politics as constitutive of technological and economic change in the form of spatio-temporal fixes and modes of regularisation and societalisation that constitute the settlement of a political economic space. C. Perez also stresses the importance of politics in the setting of techno economic trajectories and the mutual shaping&s; of politics and technology. Economics of Techn(olog)ical Change (ETC) thus carefully avoids the neoclassical errors of reifying economic states as static equilibria, but it necessarily reifies the processes and trajectories it identifies.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter illustrates the difference critical realism makes, regarding formulation of a critical, explanatory political economy of research and innovation through engagement with the evolutionary economics of innovation. The school of thought that is variously called innovation studies or the evolutionary economics of innovation (EEI) has contributed most to current understanding of the processes of technological change and innovation. The neo-Gramscian perspective places politics as constitutive of technological and economic change in the form of spatio-temporal fixes and modes of regularisation and societalisation that constitute the settlement of a political economic space. C. Perez also stresses the importance of politics in the setting of techno economic trajectories and the mutual shaping&s; of politics and technology. Economics of Techn(olog)ical Change (ETC) thus carefully avoids the neoclassical errors of reifying economic states as static equilibria, but it necessarily reifies the processes and trajectories it identifies.

Key concepts: Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The economics of research — Research Paper | ScholarLens