Rachel Cahill, Bernadette J. Richards
Abstract
Open-access reader
The article reveals the values underpinning judicial decisions in three cases in which the complexity and legal uncertainty divided the court and argues that the language of public policy is used to frame a decision based on judicial values.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The article reveals the values underpinning judicial decisions in three cases in which the complexity and legal uncertainty divided the court and argues that the language of public policy is used to frame a decision based on judicial values.
Key concepts: Underpinning, Judicial opinion, Law, Political science, Frame (networking), Law and economics, Sociology, Computer science