2017•Willan eBooksRequires access

Social influence on eyewitness memory

Anders Granhag Pär, Memon Amina, Roos Emma, Hjelmsäter af

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter mainly focuses on the influence exerted by other witnesses – so-called &s;co-witness influence&s;. It also focuses on children&s;s memory and reviews a number of sources that moderate social influence, and discusses different memory errors that may follow. The chapter turns to some of the factors that appear to regulate the social influence on adults&s; memory reports. It provides empirical evidence showing that the memory of an eyewitness is very sensitive to the views of others having witnessed the same event. The chapter shows that it is warranted to add a &s;social dimension&s; to the more cognitive inspired model presented by Ira Hyman and Elizabeth Loftus. The main conclusions to draw from these studies are that children are more vulnerable to leading questions than adults, and that pre-school-aged children are more sensitive to suggestions than are school-aged children. The most common form is an omission error that is when information is left out of a memory report.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter mainly focuses on the influence exerted by other witnesses – so-called &s;co-witness influence&s;. It also focuses on children&s;s memory and reviews a number of sources that moderate social influence, and discusses different memory errors that may follow. The chapter turns to some of the factors that appear to regulate the social influence on adults&s; memory reports. It provides empirical evidence showing that the memory of an eyewitness is very sensitive to the views of others having witnessed the same event. The chapter shows that it is warranted to add a &s;social dimension&s; to the more cognitive inspired model presented by Ira Hyman and Elizabeth Loftus. The main conclusions to draw from these studies are that children are more vulnerable to leading questions than adults, and that pre-school-aged children are more sensitive to suggestions than are school-aged children. The most common form is an omission error that is when information is left out of a memory report.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter mainly focuses on the influence exerted by other witnesses – so-called &s;co-witness influence&s;. It also focuses on children&s;s memory and reviews a number of sources that moderate social influence, and discusses different memory errors that may follow. The chapter turns to some of the factors that appear to regulate the social influence on adults&s; memory reports. It provides empirical evidence showing that the memory of an eyewitness is very sensitive to the views of others having witnessed the same event. The chapter shows that it is warranted to add a &s;social dimension&s; to the more cognitive inspired model presented by Ira Hyman and Elizabeth Loftus. The main conclusions to draw from these studies are that children are more vulnerable to leading questions than adults, and that pre-school-aged children are more sensitive to suggestions than are school-aged children. The most common form is an omission error that is when information is left out of a memory report.

Key concepts: Eyewitness testimony, Psychology, Cognitive psychology, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Social influence on eyewitness memory — Research Paper | ScholarLens