GETTING THE PRE-TRIAL INJUNCTION
Brian MacLeod Rogers, George W Hately
Abstract
Brian MacLeod Rogers, George W Hately
Abstract
After defining and describing the characteristics of interlocutory as distinct from interim injunctions, this article reviews the procedures and tests that are followed when obtaining or acting on injunctions prior to trial. It outlines American alterations to the traditional prima facie test, and describes the dissenting view in England before concluding that the American view changed the law very little. It shows a return in the UK to the former prima facie test by weighing and balancing various factors including irreparable harm and bargaining power. Against this background, the author discusses the risks involved in obtaining an injunction and methods for appeal of decisions. It also considers introduction of the Mareva injunction to Canada.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
After defining and describing the characteristics of interlocutory as distinct from interim injunctions, this article reviews the procedures and tests that are followed when obtaining or acting on injunctions prior to trial. It outlines American alterations to the traditional prima facie test, and describes the dissenting view in England before concluding that the American view changed the law very little. It shows a return in the UK to the former prima facie test by weighing and balancing various factors including irreparable harm and bargaining power. Against this background, the author discusses the risks involved in obtaining an injunction and methods for appeal of decisions. It also considers introduction of the Mareva injunction to Canada.
Key concepts: Prima facie, Interlocutory, Appeal, Interim, Dissenting opinion, Law, Political science, Harm