1982The Canadian Bar ReviewOpen access

GETTING THE PRE-TRIAL INJUNCTION

Brian MacLeod Rogers, George W Hately

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

After defining and describing the characteristics of interlocutory as distinct from interim injunctions, this article reviews the procedures and tests that are followed when obtaining or acting on injunctions prior to trial. It outlines American alterations to the traditional prima facie test, and describes the dissenting view in England before concluding that the American view changed the law very little. It shows a return in the UK to the former prima facie test by weighing and balancing various factors including irreparable harm and bargaining power. Against this background, the author discusses the risks involved in obtaining an injunction and methods for appeal of decisions. It also considers introduction of the Mareva injunction to Canada.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

After defining and describing the characteristics of interlocutory as distinct from interim injunctions, this article reviews the procedures and tests that are followed when obtaining or acting on injunctions prior to trial. It outlines American alterations to the traditional prima facie test, and describes the dissenting view in England before concluding that the American view changed the law very little. It shows a return in the UK to the former prima facie test by weighing and balancing various factors including irreparable harm and bargaining power. Against this background, the author discusses the risks involved in obtaining an injunction and methods for appeal of decisions. It also considers introduction of the Mareva injunction to Canada.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

After defining and describing the characteristics of interlocutory as distinct from interim injunctions, this article reviews the procedures and tests that are followed when obtaining or acting on injunctions prior to trial. It outlines American alterations to the traditional prima facie test, and describes the dissenting view in England before concluding that the American view changed the law very little. It shows a return in the UK to the former prima facie test by weighing and balancing various factors including irreparable harm and bargaining power. Against this background, the author discusses the risks involved in obtaining an injunction and methods for appeal of decisions. It also considers introduction of the Mareva injunction to Canada.

Key concepts: Prima facie, Interlocutory, Appeal, Interim, Dissenting opinion, Law, Political science, Harm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
GETTING THE PRE-TRIAL INJUNCTION — Research Paper | ScholarLens