2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Poverty and Social Exclusion

Phillip A. Cole

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This chapter examines the idea of social exclusion in relation to the poverty debate in the United Kingdom. Both the British Government and the European Union see poverty in terms of exclusion, and social theorists on the left, particularly those attached to the Child Poverty Action Group, have characterised poverty as social exclusion since the 1980s. The chapter discusses two political senses of social exclusion and inclusion, a radical sense and a conservative sense. The radical understanding of exclusion holds that people are prevented from participating in their own community through poverty and other factors, and inclusion therefore means empowering people to be active members of that community. The conservative understanding sees exclusion as the loss of status in a social hierarchy, and inclusion as the insertion of people back into that social order. There is a danger attached to the wide sense of social exclusion with its appeal to the idea of citizenship.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter examines the idea of social exclusion in relation to the poverty debate in the United Kingdom. Both the British Government and the European Union see poverty in terms of exclusion, and social theorists on the left, particularly those attached to the Child Poverty Action Group, have characterised poverty as social exclusion since the 1980s. The chapter discusses two political senses of social exclusion and inclusion, a radical sense and a conservative sense. The radical understanding of exclusion holds that people are prevented from participating in their own community through poverty and other factors, and inclusion therefore means empowering people to be active members of that community. The conservative understanding sees exclusion as the loss of status in a social hierarchy, and inclusion as the insertion of people back into that social order. There is a danger attached to the wide sense of social exclusion with its appeal to the idea of citizenship.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter examines the idea of social exclusion in relation to the poverty debate in the United Kingdom. Both the British Government and the European Union see poverty in terms of exclusion, and social theorists on the left, particularly those attached to the Child Poverty Action Group, have characterised poverty as social exclusion since the 1980s. The chapter discusses two political senses of social exclusion and inclusion, a radical sense and a conservative sense. The radical understanding of exclusion holds that people are prevented from participating in their own community through poverty and other factors, and inclusion therefore means empowering people to be active members of that community. The conservative understanding sees exclusion as the loss of status in a social hierarchy, and inclusion as the insertion of people back into that social order. There is a danger attached to the wide sense of social exclusion with its appeal to the idea of citizenship.

Key concepts: Social exclusion, Poverty, Social deprivation, Sociology, Political science, Criminology, Economics, Economic growth

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Poverty and Social Exclusion — Research Paper | ScholarLens