1957Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)Requires access

Confirming Statistical Hypotheses

M. G. Bulmer

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Summary This paper distinguishes between the acceptability and the confirmation of a statistical hypothesis. A hypothesis is called acceptable if it is accepted by a significance test or some similar procedure and unacceptable if it is rejected. The likelihood ratio criterion of acceptability is discussed. In order to define confirmation, a distance function is introduced in the hypothesis space which reflects the size of the departure of any hypothesis from the null hypothesis. All admissible hypotheses are tested and classified as acceptable or unacceptable. If none of the acceptable hypotheses are “near” the null hypothesis, the latter is disconfirmed; if all the acceptable hypotheses are “near” the null hypothesis, it is confirmed; otherwise the experiment is inconclusive and the null hypothesis is unconfirmed. In the second part of the paper these ideas are applied to some common statistical techniques.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary This paper distinguishes between the acceptability and the confirmation of a statistical hypothesis. A hypothesis is called acceptable if it is accepted by a significance test or some similar procedure and unacceptable if it is rejected. The likelihood ratio criterion of acceptability is discussed. In order to define confirmation, a distance function is introduced in the hypothesis space which reflects the size of the departure of any hypothesis from the null hypothesis. All admissible hypotheses are tested and classified as acceptable or unacceptable. If none of the acceptable hypotheses are “near” the null hypothesis, the latter is disconfirmed; if all the acceptable hypotheses are “near” the null hypothesis, it is confirmed; otherwise the experiment is inconclusive and the null hypothesis is unconfirmed. In the second part of the paper these ideas are applied to some common statistical techniques.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary This paper distinguishes between the acceptability and the confirmation of a statistical hypothesis. A hypothesis is called acceptable if it is accepted by a significance test or some similar procedure and unacceptable if it is rejected. The likelihood ratio criterion of acceptability is discussed. In order to define confirmation, a distance function is introduced in the hypothesis space which reflects the size of the departure of any hypothesis from the null hypothesis. All admissible hypotheses are tested and classified as acceptable or unacceptable. If none of the acceptable hypotheses are “near” the null hypothesis, the latter is disconfirmed; if all the acceptable hypotheses are “near” the null hypothesis, it is confirmed; otherwise the experiment is inconclusive and the null hypothesis is unconfirmed. In the second part of the paper these ideas are applied to some common statistical techniques.

Key concepts: Null hypothesis, Alternative hypothesis, Statistical hypothesis testing, Null (SQL), Statistical significance, Statistics, Econometrics, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Confirming Statistical Hypotheses — Research Paper | ScholarLens