2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Norms and the Response to Norms

Mark B. Okrent

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Norms come in two flavors, statistical and &s;normative&s;. The first sense of norm not the kind that became problematic during the scientific revolution. The second sense of &s;norm&s; is "a required standard; a level to be complied with or reached". As it developed in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the problem of the place of norms in nature really has two distinct, though surely related, sides. The first issue concerns what it is to be a norm. The second side of the problem has to do with the potential explanatory role of the normative in the natural world. In a modern naturalistic context, however, this direct, teleological, explanatory role for norms presents a problem. This is the problem of the intelligibility of an agent&s;s response to norms. The Kantian theory of responsiveness to norms opened up two alternative approaches to these questions that bypassed any dependence on either goals or desires.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Norms come in two flavors, statistical and &s;normative&s;. The first sense of norm not the kind that became problematic during the scientific revolution. The second sense of &s;norm&s; is "a required standard; a level to be complied with or reached". As it developed in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the problem of the place of norms in nature really has two distinct, though surely related, sides. The first issue concerns what it is to be a norm. The second side of the problem has to do with the potential explanatory role of the normative in the natural world. In a modern naturalistic context, however, this direct, teleological, explanatory role for norms presents a problem. This is the problem of the intelligibility of an agent&s;s response to norms. The Kantian theory of responsiveness to norms opened up two alternative approaches to these questions that bypassed any dependence on either goals or desires.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Norms come in two flavors, statistical and &s;normative&s;. The first sense of norm not the kind that became problematic during the scientific revolution. The second sense of &s;norm&s; is "a required standard; a level to be complied with or reached". As it developed in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the problem of the place of norms in nature really has two distinct, though surely related, sides. The first issue concerns what it is to be a norm. The second side of the problem has to do with the potential explanatory role of the normative in the natural world. In a modern naturalistic context, however, this direct, teleological, explanatory role for norms presents a problem. This is the problem of the intelligibility of an agent&s;s response to norms. The Kantian theory of responsiveness to norms opened up two alternative approaches to these questions that bypassed any dependence on either goals or desires.

Key concepts: Political science, Psychology, Sociology, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Norms and the Response to Norms — Research Paper | ScholarLens