2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

Constitutional Courts in Context

Juliette G. Duara

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

While India, Canada and South Africa (SA) share in common certain aspects of their judicial and political processes, they remain in many respects very disparate societies. One of the ways in which they differ is in the status of women. Judicial independence and accountability as contextual factors are somewhat easier to gauge than the other factors as these elements can be assessed using attributes of the judiciary which are generally either specified in the constitution or in a statute. Although Canada is as a nation older than India, as is its supreme court, its justiciable Charter of Rights and Freedoms is of recent vintage. Of more recent vintage still is the South African Constitution, the "birth certificate" of a new nation, which was signed into law by President Nelson Mandela in 1996. "Transformative" and "aspirational" are words used frequently to describe South Africa&s;s 1996 Final Constitution.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

While India, Canada and South Africa (SA) share in common certain aspects of their judicial and political processes, they remain in many respects very disparate societies. One of the ways in which they differ is in the status of women. Judicial independence and accountability as contextual factors are somewhat easier to gauge than the other factors as these elements can be assessed using attributes of the judiciary which are generally either specified in the constitution or in a statute. Although Canada is as a nation older than India, as is its supreme court, its justiciable Charter of Rights and Freedoms is of recent vintage. Of more recent vintage still is the South African Constitution, the "birth certificate" of a new nation, which was signed into law by President Nelson Mandela in 1996. "Transformative" and "aspirational" are words used frequently to describe South Africa&s;s 1996 Final Constitution.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

While India, Canada and South Africa (SA) share in common certain aspects of their judicial and political processes, they remain in many respects very disparate societies. One of the ways in which they differ is in the status of women. Judicial independence and accountability as contextual factors are somewhat easier to gauge than the other factors as these elements can be assessed using attributes of the judiciary which are generally either specified in the constitution or in a statute. Although Canada is as a nation older than India, as is its supreme court, its justiciable Charter of Rights and Freedoms is of recent vintage. Of more recent vintage still is the South African Constitution, the "birth certificate" of a new nation, which was signed into law by President Nelson Mandela in 1996. "Transformative" and "aspirational" are words used frequently to describe South Africa&s;s 1996 Final Constitution.

Key concepts: Political science, Context (archaeology), Law, History, Archaeology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Constitutional Courts in Context — Research Paper | ScholarLens