2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

Computer Hackers and Hacking

Thomas J. Holt, Adam M. Bossler, Kathryn C. Seigfried‐Spellar

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter presents the subculture of hackers in a realistic light devoid of the glitz and flash of what may be portrayed in films. It discusses the variations in the legal and ethical perspectives of hackers, as well as the norms and values of the hacker subculture. The chapter identifies the ways in which both people and technology can be compromised by hackers. It explains the key norms and values of the hacker subculture and identifies the various terms used to define and differentiate hackers. The chapter explores the legal frameworks used to prosecute hackers and the ability of law enforcement agencies to address computer hacking. The issue of ownership and access is why David Wall conceived of computer hacking as an act of cyber-trespass in keeping with burglary in the real world. In fact, many hackers deny any harm resulting from their actions, or blame their victims for having inadequate computer skills or systems to prevent victimization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter presents the subculture of hackers in a realistic light devoid of the glitz and flash of what may be portrayed in films. It discusses the variations in the legal and ethical perspectives of hackers, as well as the norms and values of the hacker subculture. The chapter identifies the ways in which both people and technology can be compromised by hackers. It explains the key norms and values of the hacker subculture and identifies the various terms used to define and differentiate hackers. The chapter explores the legal frameworks used to prosecute hackers and the ability of law enforcement agencies to address computer hacking. The issue of ownership and access is why David Wall conceived of computer hacking as an act of cyber-trespass in keeping with burglary in the real world. In fact, many hackers deny any harm resulting from their actions, or blame their victims for having inadequate computer skills or systems to prevent victimization.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter presents the subculture of hackers in a realistic light devoid of the glitz and flash of what may be portrayed in films. It discusses the variations in the legal and ethical perspectives of hackers, as well as the norms and values of the hacker subculture. The chapter identifies the ways in which both people and technology can be compromised by hackers. It explains the key norms and values of the hacker subculture and identifies the various terms used to define and differentiate hackers. The chapter explores the legal frameworks used to prosecute hackers and the ability of law enforcement agencies to address computer hacking. The issue of ownership and access is why David Wall conceived of computer hacking as an act of cyber-trespass in keeping with burglary in the real world. In fact, many hackers deny any harm resulting from their actions, or blame their victims for having inadequate computer skills or systems to prevent victimization.

Key concepts: Hacker, Computer security, Internet privacy, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Computer Hackers and Hacking — Research Paper | ScholarLens