2018Unpublished venueRequires access

The biologisation of gender

Miguel Roselló‐Peñaloza

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The search for the causes of transsexuality, of increasing interest in recent years, has focused on the intra-uterine life and on the physiological, neurological and molecular mismatches that the fetus could undergo. Through the analysis of different scientific materials that develop this explanation, this chapter presents the main rhetorical strategies that converge in biologising transsexuality and identity, with particular attention to their effects of power and to how and why their contents appear as unquestionable. This discursive construction of gender and identity as natural and therefore universal, ahistorical and material entities, functions as a normative imposition of linear evolutionary development that places transsexualism, configured as an organic imbalance, within the field of expertise of medicine and its interventions. Based on a discursive analysis of explanations such as these, this chapter also reviews the colonisation of psychosocial explanations by biological hypothesis, the political and productive character of the pharmacological industry in gender terms, sexist roots of genital reconstruction surgeries, the double-performative effect of biologising identities and also the productive movement of medicine between depsychologising and psychopathologising transsexuality.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The search for the causes of transsexuality, of increasing interest in recent years, has focused on the intra-uterine life and on the physiological, neurological and molecular mismatches that the fetus could undergo. Through the analysis of different scientific materials that develop this explanation, this chapter presents the main rhetorical strategies that converge in biologising transsexuality and identity, with particular attention to their effects of power and to how and why their contents appear as unquestionable. This discursive construction of gender and identity as natural and therefore universal, ahistorical and material entities, functions as a normative imposition of linear evolutionary development that places transsexualism, configured as an organic imbalance, within the field of expertise of medicine and its interventions. Based on a discursive analysis of explanations such as these, this chapter also reviews the colonisation of psychosocial explanations by biological hypothesis, the political and productive character of the pharmacological industry in gender terms, sexist roots of genital reconstruction surgeries, the double-performative effect of biologising identities and also the productive movement of medicine between depsychologising and psychopathologising transsexuality.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The search for the causes of transsexuality, of increasing interest in recent years, has focused on the intra-uterine life and on the physiological, neurological and molecular mismatches that the fetus could undergo. Through the analysis of different scientific materials that develop this explanation, this chapter presents the main rhetorical strategies that converge in biologising transsexuality and identity, with particular attention to their effects of power and to how and why their contents appear as unquestionable. This discursive construction of gender and identity as natural and therefore universal, ahistorical and material entities, functions as a normative imposition of linear evolutionary development that places transsexualism, configured as an organic imbalance, within the field of expertise of medicine and its interventions. Based on a discursive analysis of explanations such as these, this chapter also reviews the colonisation of psychosocial explanations by biological hypothesis, the political and productive character of the pharmacological industry in gender terms, sexist roots of genital reconstruction surgeries, the double-performative effect of biologising identities and also the productive movement of medicine between depsychologising and psychopathologising transsexuality.

Key concepts: Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The biologisation of gender — Research Paper | ScholarLens