2017Unpublished venueRequires access

The unloveliness of moral education

Michael Hand

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This conclusion presents some closing thoughts on the concepts covered in the preceding chapters of this book. The book expresses that a central aim of moral education – that of bringing it about that children subscribe to moral standards and believe them to be justified – is defensible and realisable. There is a set of conflict-averting and cooperation-sustaining standards to which full moral commitment can and should be cultivated. The book addresses the worry that moral education is a rather unpleasant business. It offers two kinds of response to this worry. The first is to admit that the accusation of unloveliness has some force: the ugliness of some moral emotions is a bullet that has to be bitten by the defender of rational moral education. The second response, though, is to put up some resistance to the charge: notwithstanding the prominence it gives to guilt and blame, rational moral education is not nearly as unlovely as White suggests.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This conclusion presents some closing thoughts on the concepts covered in the preceding chapters of this book. The book expresses that a central aim of moral education – that of bringing it about that children subscribe to moral standards and believe them to be justified – is defensible and realisable. There is a set of conflict-averting and cooperation-sustaining standards to which full moral commitment can and should be cultivated. The book addresses the worry that moral education is a rather unpleasant business. It offers two kinds of response to this worry. The first is to admit that the accusation of unloveliness has some force: the ugliness of some moral emotions is a bullet that has to be bitten by the defender of rational moral education. The second response, though, is to put up some resistance to the charge: notwithstanding the prominence it gives to guilt and blame, rational moral education is not nearly as unlovely as White suggests.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This conclusion presents some closing thoughts on the concepts covered in the preceding chapters of this book. The book expresses that a central aim of moral education – that of bringing it about that children subscribe to moral standards and believe them to be justified – is defensible and realisable. There is a set of conflict-averting and cooperation-sustaining standards to which full moral commitment can and should be cultivated. The book addresses the worry that moral education is a rather unpleasant business. It offers two kinds of response to this worry. The first is to admit that the accusation of unloveliness has some force: the ugliness of some moral emotions is a bullet that has to be bitten by the defender of rational moral education. The second response, though, is to put up some resistance to the charge: notwithstanding the prominence it gives to guilt and blame, rational moral education is not nearly as unlovely as White suggests.

Key concepts: Moral education, Psychology, Sociology, Pedagogy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The unloveliness of moral education — Research Paper | ScholarLens