2018•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Legal Concept of Legitimacy

Paul Groarke

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter reviews the legal principle of legitimacy, which has not received significant attention in the literature. The legitimacy of the law and the legal system rests more prominently on its moral aspects, however. The problem with legal positivism is precisely that it substitutes a political for a legal or moral standard of legitimacy. The court in the Secession Reference essentially reserved its right to rule on the legal legitimacy of the actions of the political actors in any controversy over secession. The legal process stands in contrast to the political process. Although the concerns that inform decision-making in the political arena are substantive, the democratic process is essentially a procedural process. In &s;Moral conflict and political legitimacy&s; for example, Thomas Nagel argues that the conduct of political actors needs to be justified on moral grounds. The question of moral legitimacy raises issues with respect to the nature and extent of the jurisdiction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter reviews the legal principle of legitimacy, which has not received significant attention in the literature. The legitimacy of the law and the legal system rests more prominently on its moral aspects, however. The problem with legal positivism is precisely that it substitutes a political for a legal or moral standard of legitimacy. The court in the Secession Reference essentially reserved its right to rule on the legal legitimacy of the actions of the political actors in any controversy over secession. The legal process stands in contrast to the political process. Although the concerns that inform decision-making in the political arena are substantive, the democratic process is essentially a procedural process. In &s;Moral conflict and political legitimacy&s; for example, Thomas Nagel argues that the conduct of political actors needs to be justified on moral grounds. The question of moral legitimacy raises issues with respect to the nature and extent of the jurisdiction.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter reviews the legal principle of legitimacy, which has not received significant attention in the literature. The legitimacy of the law and the legal system rests more prominently on its moral aspects, however. The problem with legal positivism is precisely that it substitutes a political for a legal or moral standard of legitimacy. The court in the Secession Reference essentially reserved its right to rule on the legal legitimacy of the actions of the political actors in any controversy over secession. The legal process stands in contrast to the political process. Although the concerns that inform decision-making in the political arena are substantive, the democratic process is essentially a procedural process. In &s;Moral conflict and political legitimacy&s; for example, Thomas Nagel argues that the conduct of political actors needs to be justified on moral grounds. The question of moral legitimacy raises issues with respect to the nature and extent of the jurisdiction.

Key concepts: Legitimacy, Political science, Law and economics, Engineering ethics, Epistemology, Law, Sociology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Legal Concept of Legitimacy — Research Paper | ScholarLens