Comparative literature and Latin American literary studies
Guillermina De Ferrari
Abstract
Guillermina De Ferrari
Abstract
In the summer of 2015, Guillermina De Ferrari asked seven experts in Latin American literary studies for brief responses to the following three questions: Assuming that there is a field called “Latin American comparative literature,” what are its critical and theoretical concerns? What is the contribution of comparative literature to the field of Latin American literary studies? What is the contribution of Latin American literature and criticism either to new critical and theoretical paradigms or to the formation of new corpora?
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In the summer of 2015, Guillermina De Ferrari asked seven experts in Latin American literary studies for brief responses to the following three questions: Assuming that there is a field called “Latin American comparative literature,” what are its critical and theoretical concerns? What is the contribution of comparative literature to the field of Latin American literary studies? What is the contribution of Latin American literature and criticism either to new critical and theoretical paradigms or to the formation of new corpora?
Key concepts: Literature, History, Art