2017•Young scholars in writingRequires access

Metadiscourse in Professional and Student Writing: A Corpus Study

Katelyn Guichelaar

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Linguists and discourse theorists have found differences between student and professional writers, often framing student writing as immature and lacking rhetorical skills. These differences are often explored through the examination of metadiscourse, elements within writing that show the author’s explicit consideration of audience and organization. However, when discussing effective writing, difficulties arise because the criteria for effective writing differs depending on audience, context, and purpose. This paper reports on the results of a corpus study on the use of metadiscourse in undergraduate and professional writing in composition studies. The aims of the study are to offer possible reasons for differences between student and professional writer’s use of metadiscourse and to stress the importance of audience, context, and purpose when teaching and learning how to write.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Linguists and discourse theorists have found differences between student and professional writers, often framing student writing as immature and lacking rhetorical skills. These differences are often explored through the examination of metadiscourse, elements within writing that show the author’s explicit consideration of audience and organization. However, when discussing effective writing, difficulties arise because the criteria for effective writing differs depending on audience, context, and purpose. This paper reports on the results of a corpus study on the use of metadiscourse in undergraduate and professional writing in composition studies. The aims of the study are to offer possible reasons for differences between student and professional writer’s use of metadiscourse and to stress the importance of audience, context, and purpose when teaching and learning how to write.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Linguists and discourse theorists have found differences between student and professional writers, often framing student writing as immature and lacking rhetorical skills. These differences are often explored through the examination of metadiscourse, elements within writing that show the author’s explicit consideration of audience and organization. However, when discussing effective writing, difficulties arise because the criteria for effective writing differs depending on audience, context, and purpose. This paper reports on the results of a corpus study on the use of metadiscourse in undergraduate and professional writing in composition studies. The aims of the study are to offer possible reasons for differences between student and professional writer’s use of metadiscourse and to stress the importance of audience, context, and purpose when teaching and learning how to write.

Key concepts: Metadiscourse, Rhetorical question, Professional writing, Scientific writing, Psychology, Context (archaeology), Framing (construction), Linguistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Metadiscourse in Professional and Student Writing: A Corpus Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens