2018Inland WatersRequires access

Are there differences in the fouling of the native and invasive Unionidae by Dreissena polymorpha?

Maria Urbańska, W. Andrzejewski, Henryk Gierszal, Janusz Golski

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Bivalves of the family Unionidae live partly buried in the sediments, usually with the posterior part of their shell exposed to the water column to enable filtration. This exposed part of the shell can therefore serve as a substratum for zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha), which limit the host’s ability to feed, move, and breed. We analyzed images of shells of 2 unionid species from Lake Gosławskie in western Poland: the native duck mussel (Anodonta anatina) and the invasive Chinese pond mussel (Sinanodonta woodiana). Our results show that these 2 species significantly differed in shell surface available to zebra mussels. A. anatina was consistently more heavily fouled than S. woodiana and had a greater surface area of the shell exposed in the water column. On average, only 25.5% of the shell of S. woodiana was exposed above the sediments (range 17.6–39.2%) compared to 45.4% of the shell of A. anatina (range 24.6–64.4%). Thus S. woodiana is more deeply buried in the mud, providing better protection from the negative impact of zebra mussels and making this Chinese species more competitive than the native A. anatina.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Bivalves of the family Unionidae live partly buried in the sediments, usually with the posterior part of their shell exposed to the water column to enable filtration. This exposed part of the shell can therefore serve as a substratum for zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha), which limit the host’s ability to feed, move, and breed. We analyzed images of shells of 2 unionid species from Lake Gosławskie in western Poland: the native duck mussel (Anodonta anatina) and the invasive Chinese pond mussel (Sinanodonta woodiana). Our results show that these 2 species significantly differed in shell surface available to zebra mussels. A. anatina was consistently more heavily fouled than S. woodiana and had a greater surface area of the shell exposed in the water column. On average, only 25.5% of the shell of S. woodiana was exposed above the sediments (range 17.6–39.2%) compared to 45.4% of the shell of A. anatina (range 24.6–64.4%). Thus S. woodiana is more deeply buried in the mud, providing better protection from the negative impact of zebra mussels and making this Chinese species more competitive than the native A. anatina.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Bivalves of the family Unionidae live partly buried in the sediments, usually with the posterior part of their shell exposed to the water column to enable filtration. This exposed part of the shell can therefore serve as a substratum for zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha), which limit the host’s ability to feed, move, and breed. We analyzed images of shells of 2 unionid species from Lake Gosławskie in western Poland: the native duck mussel (Anodonta anatina) and the invasive Chinese pond mussel (Sinanodonta woodiana). Our results show that these 2 species significantly differed in shell surface available to zebra mussels. A. anatina was consistently more heavily fouled than S. woodiana and had a greater surface area of the shell exposed in the water column. On average, only 25.5% of the shell of S. woodiana was exposed above the sediments (range 17.6–39.2%) compared to 45.4% of the shell of A. anatina (range 24.6–64.4%). Thus S. woodiana is more deeply buried in the mud, providing better protection from the negative impact of zebra mussels and making this Chinese species more competitive than the native A. anatina.

Key concepts: Dreissena, Zebra mussel, Unionidae, Invasive species, Corbicula fluminea, Biology, Mussel, Freshwater bivalve

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Are there differences in the fouling of the native and invasive Unionidae by Dreissena polymorpha? — Research Paper | ScholarLens