2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Pavement model tests to investigate the effects of geogrid as subgrade reinforcement

Chamara Prasad Gunasekara Jayalath, Chaminda Gallage, Manicka Dhanasekar, Biyanvilage Dareeju, J Ramanujam, Jeffrey Lee

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The stabilization of weak subgrade is commonly required before placing the pavement structural layers. It is well known that geogrids can be used to reinforce the weak subgrades, however, verification using local conditions is needed to convince road authorities. In this study, two identical model pavements: one without composite geogrid and the other with composite-geogrid reinforcement at the interface of the subgrade-base layer were prepared in a steel box with length, width and height of 1m, 1m and 1.2m, respectively. The 500mm thick subgrade was prepared to achieve a CBR value less than 3% and then a 200mm granular layer was compacted on top of the subgrade to achieve 91% of its maximum dry density. The model pavements were instrumented with Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDTs), soil pressure transducers and moisture sensors. Both pavement models were subjected to repeated loading (more than 110, 000 cycles) at the centre using a 200mm diameter plate to simulate the maximum tyre pressure of 550kPa. The test results showed that the inclusion of composite geogrid at the base-subgrade interface can significantly reduce the rutting depth of granular pavement on weak subgrade (CBR < 3 %). At 50mm rutting, an approximate Traffic Benefit Ratio (TBR) of 5 could be achieved by using composite-geogrid-reinforced subgrade. Furthermore, the pressure transmission to the subgrade was significantly reduced by the composite geogrid at the interface.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The stabilization of weak subgrade is commonly required before placing the pavement structural layers. It is well known that geogrids can be used to reinforce the weak subgrades, however, verification using local conditions is needed to convince road authorities. In this study, two identical model pavements: one without composite geogrid and the other with composite-geogrid reinforcement at the interface of the subgrade-base layer were prepared in a steel box with length, width and height of 1m, 1m and 1.2m, respectively. The 500mm thick subgrade was prepared to achieve a CBR value less than 3% and then a 200mm granular layer was compacted on top of the subgrade to achieve 91% of its maximum dry density. The model pavements were instrumented with Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDTs), soil pressure transducers and moisture sensors. Both pavement models were subjected to repeated loading (more than 110, 000 cycles) at the centre using a 200mm diameter plate to simulate the maximum tyre pressure of 550kPa. The test results showed that the inclusion of composite geogrid at the base-subgrade interface can significantly reduce the rutting depth of granular pavement on weak subgrade (CBR < 3 %). At 50mm rutting, an approximate Traffic Benefit Ratio (TBR) of 5 could be achieved by using composite-geogrid-reinforced subgrade. Furthermore, the pressure transmission to the subgrade was significantly reduced by the composite geogrid at the interface.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The stabilization of weak subgrade is commonly required before placing the pavement structural layers. It is well known that geogrids can be used to reinforce the weak subgrades, however, verification using local conditions is needed to convince road authorities. In this study, two identical model pavements: one without composite geogrid and the other with composite-geogrid reinforcement at the interface of the subgrade-base layer were prepared in a steel box with length, width and height of 1m, 1m and 1.2m, respectively. The 500mm thick subgrade was prepared to achieve a CBR value less than 3% and then a 200mm granular layer was compacted on top of the subgrade to achieve 91% of its maximum dry density. The model pavements were instrumented with Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDTs), soil pressure transducers and moisture sensors. Both pavement models were subjected to repeated loading (more than 110, 000 cycles) at the centre using a 200mm diameter plate to simulate the maximum tyre pressure of 550kPa. The test results showed that the inclusion of composite geogrid at the base-subgrade interface can significantly reduce the rutting depth of granular pavement on weak subgrade (CBR < 3 %). At 50mm rutting, an approximate Traffic Benefit Ratio (TBR) of 5 could be achieved by using composite-geogrid-reinforced subgrade. Furthermore, the pressure transmission to the subgrade was significantly reduced by the composite geogrid at the interface.

Key concepts: Subgrade, Geogrid, Geotechnical engineering, Rut, Composite number, Materials science, Displacement (psychology), Geosynthetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pavement model tests to investigate the effects of geogrid as subgrade reinforcement — Research Paper | ScholarLens