2018Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Geography of experience: place and region

J. Nicholas Entrikin

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

The geography of experience has been a prominent theme in late twentieth and early twenty-first century geography, and the concepts of place and region along with other core geographic terms have played a central role its development. Unlike many academic concepts, place and region appear to move with relative ease between the language of the human sciences and the conversational language of everyday life. The semantic elasticity that makes such a smooth transition possible may also help explain the persistence of these concepts in research despite the highly fragmented theoretical and meta-theoretical character of geography. The expanded meanings of these concepts are testing new limits, however, as more materialist and reductionist orientations are posited that limit or significantly reduce the role of the geographic subject as agent. Recent discussions of place and region are reviewed in light of the history of research on the geography of experience.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The geography of experience has been a prominent theme in late twentieth and early twenty-first century geography, and the concepts of place and region along with other core geographic terms have played a central role its development. Unlike many academic concepts, place and region appear to move with relative ease between the language of the human sciences and the conversational language of everyday life. The semantic elasticity that makes such a smooth transition possible may also help explain the persistence of these concepts in research despite the highly fragmented theoretical and meta-theoretical character of geography. The expanded meanings of these concepts are testing new limits, however, as more materialist and reductionist orientations are posited that limit or significantly reduce the role of the geographic subject as agent. Recent discussions of place and region are reviewed in light of the history of research on the geography of experience.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The geography of experience has been a prominent theme in late twentieth and early twenty-first century geography, and the concepts of place and region along with other core geographic terms have played a central role its development. Unlike many academic concepts, place and region appear to move with relative ease between the language of the human sciences and the conversational language of everyday life. The semantic elasticity that makes such a smooth transition possible may also help explain the persistence of these concepts in research despite the highly fragmented theoretical and meta-theoretical character of geography. The expanded meanings of these concepts are testing new limits, however, as more materialist and reductionist orientations are posited that limit or significantly reduce the role of the geographic subject as agent. Recent discussions of place and region are reviewed in light of the history of research on the geography of experience.

Key concepts: Reductionism, Language geography, Geography, Discipline, Materialism, Epistemology, Everyday life, Human geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Geography of experience: place and region — Research Paper | ScholarLens