2018•Journal of Power SourcesOpen access

Screening of effective electrolyte additives for zinc-based redox flow battery systems

David P. Trudgeon, Kaipei Qiu, Xiaohong Li, Tapas Kumar Mallick, Oluwadamilola O. Taiwo, Barun Kumar Chakrabarti, Vladimir Yufit, Nigel Peter Brandon, D. Crevillén-García, Akeel Abbas Shah

Open full text 72 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to assess the suitability of potential electrolyte additives for zinc morphology control and improved electrochemical performance of the zinc electrode for application in zinc based redox flow battery (RFB) systems. Based on existing literature in the field, sixteen candidates are selected, including four metallic additives, two non-ionic surfactants and ten quaternary ammonium compounds. The electrochemical performance of the zinc electrode is assessed using cyclic voltammetry, linear sweep voltammetry and zinc half-cell cycling tests using chronopotentiometry. Zinc electrodepositions are carried out using chronopotentiometry in order to assess the effect of additives on zinc morphology with scanning electron microscopy. Based on zinc reduction and oxidation reaction potentials, the cycling efficiencies, and the effect on zinc morphology, the most promising additives of those tested are tetraethylammonium hydroxide and tetraethylammonium bromide. Both provide smooth and compact zinc deposits and zinc electrode coulombic efficiencies of 95–97% without leading to significant changes in the zinc reduction/oxidation overpotentials, yielding anodic and cathodic current densities of 77–78 mA cm −2 and 31–32 mA cm −2 at overpotentials of ± 50 mV, respectively. In a zinc-nickel flow cell, these additives provide energy efficiencies of 78–79%, compared with 69% without an additive.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this work is to assess the suitability of potential electrolyte additives for zinc morphology control and improved electrochemical performance of the zinc electrode for application in zinc based redox flow battery (RFB) systems. Based on existing literature in the field, sixteen candidates are selected, including four metallic additives, two non-ionic surfactants and ten quaternary ammonium compounds. The electrochemical performance of the zinc electrode is assessed using cyclic voltammetry, linear sweep voltammetry and zinc half-cell cycling tests using chronopotentiometry. Zinc electrodepositions are carried out using chronopotentiometry in order to assess the effect of additives on zinc morphology with scanning electron microscopy. Based on zinc reduction and oxidation reaction potentials, the cycling efficiencies, and the effect on zinc morphology, the most promising additives of those tested are tetraethylammonium hydroxide and tetraethylammonium bromide. Both provide smooth and compact zinc deposits and zinc electrode coulombic efficiencies of 95–97% without leading to significant changes in the zinc reduction/oxidation overpotentials, yielding anodic and cathodic current densities of 77–78 mA cm −2 and 31–32 mA cm −2 at overpotentials of ± 50 mV, respectively. In a zinc-nickel flow cell, these additives provide energy efficiencies of 78–79%, compared with 69% without an additive.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 72 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this work is to assess the suitability of potential electrolyte additives for zinc morphology control and improved electrochemical performance of the zinc electrode for application in zinc based redox flow battery (RFB) systems. Based on existing literature in the field, sixteen candidates are selected, including four metallic additives, two non-ionic surfactants and ten quaternary ammonium compounds. The electrochemical performance of the zinc electrode is assessed using cyclic voltammetry, linear sweep voltammetry and zinc half-cell cycling tests using chronopotentiometry. Zinc electrodepositions are carried out using chronopotentiometry in order to assess the effect of additives on zinc morphology with scanning electron microscopy. Based on zinc reduction and oxidation reaction potentials, the cycling efficiencies, and the effect on zinc morphology, the most promising additives of those tested are tetraethylammonium hydroxide and tetraethylammonium bromide. Both provide smooth and compact zinc deposits and zinc electrode coulombic efficiencies of 95–97% without leading to significant changes in the zinc reduction/oxidation overpotentials, yielding anodic and cathodic current densities of 77–78 mA cm −2 and 31–32 mA cm −2 at overpotentials of ± 50 mV, respectively. In a zinc-nickel flow cell, these additives provide energy efficiencies of 78–79%, compared with 69% without an additive.

Key concepts: Zinc, Flow battery, Cyclic voltammetry, Electrochemistry, Inorganic chemistry, Chemistry, Electrolyte, Redox

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Screening of effective electrolyte additives for zinc-based redox flow battery systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens