2018Clinical CardiologyOpen access

Bioelectrical impedance analysis of body composition and survival in patients with heart failure

E. S. Thomas, Pritha Gupta, Gregg C. Fonarow, Tamara B. Horwich

Open full text 51 citations

Abstract

Background Studies have shown that higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with improved prognosis in heart failure (HF), and this is often termed the obesity paradox. Hypothesis Analysis of body composition may reveal that muscle mass rather than adipose tissue accounts for the obesity paradox. Methods Bioelectrical impedance analysis of body composition in 359 outpatients with HF was performed using an In Body 520 body composition scale (Biospace Inc., California). Body fat and lean mass were indexed by height (m 2 ). The cohort was stratified by median fat and lean mass indexed by height. Results The mean age of patients studied was 56 ± 14; mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 38 ± 16%. Patients with higher indexed body fat mass had improved 5‐year survival over patients with lower indexed body fat mass (90.2% vs 80.1%, P = 0.008). There was also improved survival in patients with high vs low indexed lean body mass (89.3% vs 80.9%, P = 0.036). On multivariable analysis, higher indexed body fat mass, but not lean body mass, was independently associated with improved survival (HR 0.89, per kg/m 2 increase in indexed body fat mass, P = 0.044); however, this was attenuated after adjustment for diabetes. The combination of low lean with low‐fat mass was independently associated with poor prognosis. Conclusions Our data suggest that higher fat mass—and to a lesser extent higher lean mass—is associated with improved outcomes in HF. Further investigations of specific components of body composition and outcomes in HF are warranted.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background Studies have shown that higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with improved prognosis in heart failure (HF), and this is often termed the obesity paradox. Hypothesis Analysis of body composition may reveal that muscle mass rather than adipose tissue accounts for the obesity paradox. Methods Bioelectrical impedance analysis of body composition in 359 outpatients with HF was performed using an In Body 520 body composition scale (Biospace Inc., California). Body fat and lean mass were indexed by height (m 2 ). The cohort was stratified by median fat and lean mass indexed by height. Results The mean age of patients studied was 56 ± 14; mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 38 ± 16%. Patients with higher indexed body fat mass had improved 5‐year survival over patients with lower indexed body fat mass (90.2% vs 80.1%, P = 0.008). There was also improved survival in patients with high vs low indexed lean body mass (89.3% vs 80.9%, P = 0.036). On multivariable analysis, higher indexed body fat mass, but not lean body mass, was independently associated with improved survival (HR 0.89, per kg/m 2 increase in indexed body fat mass, P = 0.044); however, this was attenuated after adjustment for diabetes. The combination of low lean with low‐fat mass was independently associated with poor prognosis. Conclusions Our data suggest that higher fat mass—and to a lesser extent higher lean mass—is associated with improved outcomes in HF. Further investigations of specific components of body composition and outcomes in HF are warranted.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background Studies have shown that higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with improved prognosis in heart failure (HF), and this is often termed the obesity paradox. Hypothesis Analysis of body composition may reveal that muscle mass rather than adipose tissue accounts for the obesity paradox. Methods Bioelectrical impedance analysis of body composition in 359 outpatients with HF was performed using an In Body 520 body composition scale (Biospace Inc., California). Body fat and lean mass were indexed by height (m 2 ). The cohort was stratified by median fat and lean mass indexed by height. Results The mean age of patients studied was 56 ± 14; mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 38 ± 16%. Patients with higher indexed body fat mass had improved 5‐year survival over patients with lower indexed body fat mass (90.2% vs 80.1%, P = 0.008). There was also improved survival in patients with high vs low indexed lean body mass (89.3% vs 80.9%, P = 0.036). On multivariable analysis, higher indexed body fat mass, but not lean body mass, was independently associated with improved survival (HR 0.89, per kg/m 2 increase in indexed body fat mass, P = 0.044); however, this was attenuated after adjustment for diabetes. The combination of low lean with low‐fat mass was independently associated with poor prognosis. Conclusions Our data suggest that higher fat mass—and to a lesser extent higher lean mass—is associated with improved outcomes in HF. Further investigations of specific components of body composition and outcomes in HF are warranted.

Key concepts: Bioelectrical impedance analysis, Lean body mass, Medicine, Body mass index, Obesity paradox, Obesity, Ejection fraction, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioelectrical impedance analysis of body composition and survival in patients with heart failure — Research Paper | ScholarLens