2018Soil Use and ManagementRequires access

The pH buffering capacity of Acrisols under cassava production in Southeastern Vietnam, Chau Thanh district

Tho Nguyen

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study examined the pH buffering capacity (pH BC ) of haplic Acrisols under intensive cassava production in an upland area of Southeastern Vietnam where accelerated soil acidification has occurred. Soil samples (0–20, 20–40 and 40–60 cm) were taken at 12 sites under cassava and three sites under secondary dipterocarp forest as reference. The pH buffer curves were linear in the pH H2O range from 3.97 to 5.24, corresponding to a pH CaCl2 range from 3.74 to 5.20. Soil pH BC were low (1.16 ± 0.13 cmol/kg/ pH ) and correlated significantly with pH , Aluminium (Al) and Al‐related components. The results suggested that exchange acidity contributes significantly to soil's buffering capacity in acidic soils with low organic carbon. It also pointed to the possibility of using indicators of acidity to estimate soil pH BC . The low pH BC indicated a high risk for further acidification and also pointed to the possibility of using lime to remediate soils. Either acid buffering capacity or lime buffering capacity not pH BC in general should be considered, respectively, in acidification and liming studies. Factors and processes involved in soil acidification and liming need to be addressed as a background for soil remediation in the study area.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This study examined the pH buffering capacity (pH BC ) of haplic Acrisols under intensive cassava production in an upland area of Southeastern Vietnam where accelerated soil acidification has occurred. Soil samples (0–20, 20–40 and 40–60 cm) were taken at 12 sites under cassava and three sites under secondary dipterocarp forest as reference. The pH buffer curves were linear in the pH H2O range from 3.97 to 5.24, corresponding to a pH CaCl2 range from 3.74 to 5.20. Soil pH BC were low (1.16 ± 0.13 cmol/kg/ pH ) and correlated significantly with pH , Aluminium (Al) and Al‐related components. The results suggested that exchange acidity contributes significantly to soil's buffering capacity in acidic soils with low organic carbon. It also pointed to the possibility of using indicators of acidity to estimate soil pH BC . The low pH BC indicated a high risk for further acidification and also pointed to the possibility of using lime to remediate soils. Either acid buffering capacity or lime buffering capacity not pH BC in general should be considered, respectively, in acidification and liming studies. Factors and processes involved in soil acidification and liming need to be addressed as a background for soil remediation in the study area.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This study examined the pH buffering capacity (pH BC ) of haplic Acrisols under intensive cassava production in an upland area of Southeastern Vietnam where accelerated soil acidification has occurred. Soil samples (0–20, 20–40 and 40–60 cm) were taken at 12 sites under cassava and three sites under secondary dipterocarp forest as reference. The pH buffer curves were linear in the pH H2O range from 3.97 to 5.24, corresponding to a pH CaCl2 range from 3.74 to 5.20. Soil pH BC were low (1.16 ± 0.13 cmol/kg/ pH ) and correlated significantly with pH , Aluminium (Al) and Al‐related components. The results suggested that exchange acidity contributes significantly to soil's buffering capacity in acidic soils with low organic carbon. It also pointed to the possibility of using indicators of acidity to estimate soil pH BC . The low pH BC indicated a high risk for further acidification and also pointed to the possibility of using lime to remediate soils. Either acid buffering capacity or lime buffering capacity not pH BC in general should be considered, respectively, in acidification and liming studies. Factors and processes involved in soil acidification and liming need to be addressed as a background for soil remediation in the study area.

Key concepts: Soil acidification, Cation-exchange capacity, Soil pH, Lime, Soil water, Environmental remediation, Chemistry, Environmental chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The pH buffering capacity of Acrisols under cassava production in Southeastern Vietnam, Chau Thanh district — Research Paper | ScholarLens