2018Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic SurgeryOpen access

Anatomical variations of the aortic arch branches in a sample of Chinese cadavers: embryological basis and literature review

Yumin Qiu, Xiaoxin Wu, Zhuokai Zhuang, Xiaozhi Li, Lei Zhu, Cijun Huang, Hongjie Zhuang, Mingjian Ma, Ye Feng, Jing Chen, Zhiying Wu, Xiaopei Yu, Mingjie An, Rui Chen, Junyu Chen, Lizhi Guan, Hanyi Sang, Yuyang Ye, Yueyin Han, Zhuokai Chen, Qin Han, Haoshuai Zhu, Yingying Zhou, Prince Last Mudenda Zilundu, Dazheng Xu, Lihua Zhou

Open full text 19 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine the incidence and explore the types of aortic arch branch variations found in our cadavers. METHODS: The types and incidence of aortic branch variations in 120 cadavers were analysed after careful dissection. RESULTS: One hundred and six of 120 cadavers had normal aortic arch branches and gave rise to usual branches, namely the brachiocephalic trunk, the left common carotid artery and the left subclavian artery. The remaining 14 cadavers had 2 basic types of branch variations, thus accounting for an incidence of 11.67%. A total of 9 aortic arches emitted 4 branches; the brachiocephalic trunk, the left common carotid artery, the left vertebral artery and the left subclavian artery (incidence 7.5%). The second subgroup of 5 cadavers also emitted 4 aortic branches: the right common carotid artery, the left common carotid artery, the left subclavian artery and the right subclavian artery (incidence 4.16%). In this group, the right subclavian artery sprung as a distal branch of the aortic arch (descending), thus making a vascular ring that takes a superoposterior course round the back of the trachea and the oesophagus to reach the right side. There was a single cadaver, different from the other 4 aortic branches of the second group which had a common origin for the common carotid arteries, while the left subclavian artery and distally placed right subclavian artery were present. We did not observe any Kommerell's aortic diverticula. CONCLUSIONS: The variations of aortic arch branching are complex and diverse due to varied possible alterations in the embryological processes. There is an imperative need for further research on these variations to elucidate the possible relationships with clinical diagnostic or surgical events.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine the incidence and explore the types of aortic arch branch variations found in our cadavers. METHODS: The types and incidence of aortic branch variations in 120 cadavers were analysed after careful dissection. RESULTS: One hundred and six of 120 cadavers had normal aortic arch branches and gave rise to usual branches, namely the brachiocephalic trunk, the left common carotid artery and the left subclavian artery. The remaining 14 cadavers had 2 basic types of branch variations, thus accounting for an incidence of 11.67%. A total of 9 aortic arches emitted 4 branches; the brachiocephalic trunk, the left common carotid artery, the left vertebral artery and the left subclavian artery (incidence 7.5%). The second subgroup of 5 cadavers also emitted 4 aortic branches: the right common carotid artery, the left common carotid artery, the left subclavian artery and the right subclavian artery (incidence 4.16%). In this group, the right subclavian artery sprung as a distal branch of the aortic arch (descending), thus making a vascular ring that takes a superoposterior course round the back of the trachea and the oesophagus to reach the right side. There was a single cadaver, different from the other 4 aortic branches of the second group which had a common origin for the common carotid arteries, while the left subclavian artery and distally placed right subclavian artery were present. We did not observe any Kommerell's aortic diverticula. CONCLUSIONS: The variations of aortic arch branching are complex and diverse due to varied possible alterations in the embryological processes. There is an imperative need for further research on these variations to elucidate the possible relationships with clinical diagnostic or surgical events.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine the incidence and explore the types of aortic arch branch variations found in our cadavers. METHODS: The types and incidence of aortic branch variations in 120 cadavers were analysed after careful dissection. RESULTS: One hundred and six of 120 cadavers had normal aortic arch branches and gave rise to usual branches, namely the brachiocephalic trunk, the left common carotid artery and the left subclavian artery. The remaining 14 cadavers had 2 basic types of branch variations, thus accounting for an incidence of 11.67%. A total of 9 aortic arches emitted 4 branches; the brachiocephalic trunk, the left common carotid artery, the left vertebral artery and the left subclavian artery (incidence 7.5%). The second subgroup of 5 cadavers also emitted 4 aortic branches: the right common carotid artery, the left common carotid artery, the left subclavian artery and the right subclavian artery (incidence 4.16%). In this group, the right subclavian artery sprung as a distal branch of the aortic arch (descending), thus making a vascular ring that takes a superoposterior course round the back of the trachea and the oesophagus to reach the right side. There was a single cadaver, different from the other 4 aortic branches of the second group which had a common origin for the common carotid arteries, while the left subclavian artery and distally placed right subclavian artery were present. We did not observe any Kommerell's aortic diverticula. CONCLUSIONS: The variations of aortic arch branching are complex and diverse due to varied possible alterations in the embryological processes. There is an imperative need for further research on these variations to elucidate the possible relationships with clinical diagnostic or surgical events.

Key concepts: Medicine, Aortic arch, Common carotid artery, Cadaver, Anatomy, Subclavian artery, Right Common Carotid Artery, Dissection (medical)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Anatomical variations of the aortic arch branches in a sample of Chinese cadavers: embryological basis and literature review — Research Paper | ScholarLens