2018•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Use of Force

Christy Shucksmith, Nigel D. White

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter reviews domestic cases that address the legality or otherwise of the use of force by states—the jus ad bellum—including military actions undertaken in self-defence, or under United Nations Security Council authority, as well as more contested claims (for example, targeted killings). Two sets of cases are considered: those that amount to a direct challenge to the legality of the use of force by the government of the state, where the court’s major concern is whether it is willing and able to reach decisions on the legality of the use of force given its highly politiciseized nature; and those dealing with indirect challenge or review, where the legality of the war or use of force comes up as a defence or excuse for behaviour, or to support a claim of human rights abuse.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter reviews domestic cases that address the legality or otherwise of the use of force by states—the jus ad bellum—including military actions undertaken in self-defence, or under United Nations Security Council authority, as well as more contested claims (for example, targeted killings). Two sets of cases are considered: those that amount to a direct challenge to the legality of the use of force by the government of the state, where the court’s major concern is whether it is willing and able to reach decisions on the legality of the use of force given its highly politiciseized nature; and those dealing with indirect challenge or review, where the legality of the war or use of force comes up as a defence or excuse for behaviour, or to support a claim of human rights abuse.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter reviews domestic cases that address the legality or otherwise of the use of force by states—the jus ad bellum—including military actions undertaken in self-defence, or under United Nations Security Council authority, as well as more contested claims (for example, targeted killings). Two sets of cases are considered: those that amount to a direct challenge to the legality of the use of force by the government of the state, where the court’s major concern is whether it is willing and able to reach decisions on the legality of the use of force given its highly politiciseized nature; and those dealing with indirect challenge or review, where the legality of the war or use of force comes up as a defence or excuse for behaviour, or to support a claim of human rights abuse.

Key concepts: Principle of legality, Excuse, Use of force, Political science, Law, State (computer science), Government (linguistics), Jus ad bellum

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Use of Force — Research Paper | ScholarLens