2014Minds at UW (University of Wisconsin)Open access

High intensity interval training and enjoyment

Andrew Tuuri

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

An increasing amount of attention is being given to enjoyment as a predictor of exercise adherence. Purpose: To investigate enjoyment levels during high intensity interval training. Methods: Sedentary college-aged students (n=55) participated in an eight week training intervention. The Exercise Feeling Inventory (EFI) and Exercise Enjoyment Scale (EES) were administered one day per week. Results: The EFI ANOVA indicated no statistical significance for both the revitalization and positive engagement subscales. Tranquility subscale scores were significantly higher for week five (-.183 mean) and week six (.109 mean). Physical exhaustion subscale scores were significantly higher in the Tabata group (2.211 mean). The EES ANOVA indicated pre-enjoyment scores were significantly lower for weeks four (3.228 mean) through eight (3.006 mean). The during-training enjoyment scores were significantly lower in the Tabata group (2.544 mean) and for weeks seven (2.793 mean) and eight (2.627 mean). The post-training enjoyment scores were significantly lower in the Tabata group (2.991mean) and for weeks seven (3.104 mean) and eight (3.073 mean). Conclusion: The present study revealed that subjects randomly assigned to the Tabata training group yielded statistically higher EFI physical exhaustion subscale scores and statistically lower EES during and post-training enjoyment scores, consequent to an eight week training intervention.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An increasing amount of attention is being given to enjoyment as a predictor of exercise adherence. Purpose: To investigate enjoyment levels during high intensity interval training. Methods: Sedentary college-aged students (n=55) participated in an eight week training intervention. The Exercise Feeling Inventory (EFI) and Exercise Enjoyment Scale (EES) were administered one day per week. Results: The EFI ANOVA indicated no statistical significance for both the revitalization and positive engagement subscales. Tranquility subscale scores were significantly higher for week five (-.183 mean) and week six (.109 mean). Physical exhaustion subscale scores were significantly higher in the Tabata group (2.211 mean). The EES ANOVA indicated pre-enjoyment scores were significantly lower for weeks four (3.228 mean) through eight (3.006 mean). The during-training enjoyment scores were significantly lower in the Tabata group (2.544 mean) and for weeks seven (2.793 mean) and eight (2.627 mean). The post-training enjoyment scores were significantly lower in the Tabata group (2.991mean) and for weeks seven (3.104 mean) and eight (3.073 mean). Conclusion: The present study revealed that subjects randomly assigned to the Tabata training group yielded statistically higher EFI physical exhaustion subscale scores and statistically lower EES during and post-training enjoyment scores, consequent to an eight week training intervention.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An increasing amount of attention is being given to enjoyment as a predictor of exercise adherence. Purpose: To investigate enjoyment levels during high intensity interval training. Methods: Sedentary college-aged students (n=55) participated in an eight week training intervention. The Exercise Feeling Inventory (EFI) and Exercise Enjoyment Scale (EES) were administered one day per week. Results: The EFI ANOVA indicated no statistical significance for both the revitalization and positive engagement subscales. Tranquility subscale scores were significantly higher for week five (-.183 mean) and week six (.109 mean). Physical exhaustion subscale scores were significantly higher in the Tabata group (2.211 mean). The EES ANOVA indicated pre-enjoyment scores were significantly lower for weeks four (3.228 mean) through eight (3.006 mean). The during-training enjoyment scores were significantly lower in the Tabata group (2.544 mean) and for weeks seven (2.793 mean) and eight (2.627 mean). The post-training enjoyment scores were significantly lower in the Tabata group (2.991mean) and for weeks seven (3.104 mean) and eight (3.073 mean). Conclusion: The present study revealed that subjects randomly assigned to the Tabata training group yielded statistically higher EFI physical exhaustion subscale scores and statistically lower EES during and post-training enjoyment scores, consequent to an eight week training intervention.

Key concepts: High-intensity interval training, Training (meteorology), Intensity (physics), Interval (graph theory), Psychology, Mathematics, Geography, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
High intensity interval training and enjoyment — Research Paper | ScholarLens