2018•OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)Open access

Standards-Based Grading: The Effect of Common Grading Criteria on Academic Growth.

Dawn Therese Henry

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Points-driven grading systems are prolific and persistent in American K-12 education, despite research indicating their gender and racial bias in implementation (Cornwell, Mustard & Van Parys, 2013), their lack of accuracy in representing student achievement (Allen, 2005), and their negative effect on learning (Klapp, 2015).Research indicates while teachers are open to changing their practice, they want assurance that changes will lead to improved outcomes for their students (Millard, 2016).The purpose of the study was to determine whether standards-based grading rubrics developed through a shared leadership approach significantly increased academic growth and the percentage of students demonstrating acceptable levels of growth in early literacy, reading, and math skill development.Participants in the causal-comparative post-hoc study were comprised of kindergarten through grade two students in two Midwestern public school districts, one of which issued standards-based grades while the other issued grades under a points-driven grading system.Academic growth data in the form of student growth percentiles were gathered using STAR  assessments, an online assessment tool used in both districts to measure achievement and growth.Results indicated no effect for rubric implementation in any of the three subject areas when comparing the two districts' growth scores; nor was there a significant difference in the percentage of students demonstrating acceptable growth in reading or math.However, a significantly higher percentage of students did demonstrate acceptable growth in early literacy skills after standards-based grading rubrics were implemented.The researcher concluded that teacher involvement in the development of the rubrics, as well as their use of the rubrics for instructional purposes could have mediated the effect of the tools' use.iii For my mother, Sylvia Gibson, who paid a pretty penny in 1967 to give my siblings and me a brand, new set of the World Book Encyclopedia and accompanying Childcraft How and Why Library, opening us up to an amazing world outside of our small town.We have all reaped the benefits of your love, support, and sacrificial investments in our education.I love you, Mom.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Points-driven grading systems are prolific and persistent in American K-12 education, despite research indicating their gender and racial bias in implementation (Cornwell, Mustard & Van Parys, 2013), their lack of accuracy in representing student achievement (Allen, 2005), and their negative effect on learning (Klapp, 2015).Research indicates while teachers are open to changing their practice, they want assurance that changes will lead to improved outcomes for their students (Millard, 2016).The purpose of the study was to determine whether standards-based grading rubrics developed through a shared leadership approach significantly increased academic growth and the percentage of students demonstrating acceptable levels of growth in early literacy, reading, and math skill development.Participants in the causal-comparative post-hoc study were comprised of kindergarten through grade two students in two Midwestern public school districts, one of which issued standards-based grades while the other issued grades under a points-driven grading system.Academic growth data in the form of student growth percentiles were gathered using STAR  assessments, an online assessment tool used in both districts to measure achievement and growth.Results indicated no effect for rubric implementation in any of the three subject areas when comparing the two districts' growth scores; nor was there a significant difference in the percentage of students demonstrating acceptable growth in reading or math.However, a significantly higher percentage of students did demonstrate acceptable growth in early literacy skills after standards-based grading rubrics were implemented.The researcher concluded that teacher involvement in the development of the rubrics, as well as their use of the rubrics for instructional purposes could have mediated the effect of the tools' use.iii For my mother, Sylvia Gibson, who paid a pretty penny in 1967 to give my siblings and me a brand, new set of the World Book Encyclopedia and accompanying Childcraft How and Why Library, opening us up to an amazing world outside of our small town.We have all reaped the benefits of your love, support, and sacrificial investments in our education.I love you, Mom.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Points-driven grading systems are prolific and persistent in American K-12 education, despite research indicating their gender and racial bias in implementation (Cornwell, Mustard & Van Parys, 2013), their lack of accuracy in representing student achievement (Allen, 2005), and their negative effect on learning (Klapp, 2015).Research indicates while teachers are open to changing their practice, they want assurance that changes will lead to improved outcomes for their students (Millard, 2016).The purpose of the study was to determine whether standards-based grading rubrics developed through a shared leadership approach significantly increased academic growth and the percentage of students demonstrating acceptable levels of growth in early literacy, reading, and math skill development.Participants in the causal-comparative post-hoc study were comprised of kindergarten through grade two students in two Midwestern public school districts, one of which issued standards-based grades while the other issued grades under a points-driven grading system.Academic growth data in the form of student growth percentiles were gathered using STAR  assessments, an online assessment tool used in both districts to measure achievement and growth.Results indicated no effect for rubric implementation in any of the three subject areas when comparing the two districts' growth scores; nor was there a significant difference in the percentage of students demonstrating acceptable growth in reading or math.However, a significantly higher percentage of students did demonstrate acceptable growth in early literacy skills after standards-based grading rubrics were implemented.The researcher concluded that teacher involvement in the development of the rubrics, as well as their use of the rubrics for instructional purposes could have mediated the effect of the tools' use.iii For my mother, Sylvia Gibson, who paid a pretty penny in 1967 to give my siblings and me a brand, new set of the World Book Encyclopedia and accompanying Childcraft How and Why Library, opening us up to an amazing world outside of our small town.We have all reaped the benefits of your love, support, and sacrificial investments in our education.I love you, Mom.

Key concepts: Grading (engineering), Engineering, Civil engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Standards-Based Grading: The Effect of Common Grading Criteria on Academic Growth. — Research Paper | ScholarLens