2018Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)Open access

Governance in Higher Education: A Comparative Study on Ghana and China

David Amankona, Lois Tweneboa Kodua, Tobi Michael Ogunwemimo

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Governance in higher education is one key concern for policy makers on restructuring the higher educational systems all over the world.The concepts of higher education governance often bring conflict between institutions and politicians on issues concerning institutional management.This study examined the concepts of higher education governance based on a comparative study of china and Ghana.The study gave special attention to various reforms on governance, higher education autonomy, funding, higher education law and structure of decision making in both countries.This paper argued that, if government limits its influence on higher education governance and higher education institutions are given a significant level of autonomy to make decision on academic program development and appointment of key positions, it will enable the higher education leaders use their expertise to develop high quality higher education.However, it's worth mentioning that, this paper does not argue for governmental absence on higher education governance and management; government will continue with policy formulation on higher education.The comparative study is adopted because, china's higher education has attracted many students from developing countries in Africa and Asia and Ghana as an African country has over ten thousand students pursuing programs at all levels.Higher institutions in Ghana in the past decade have enjoyed good academic relationship with Chinese institutions.Ghana as a middle-income country in the quest to build high quality higher education can learn from the Chinese system.This study will also contribute to literatures in educational governance.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Governance in higher education is one key concern for policy makers on restructuring the higher educational systems all over the world.The concepts of higher education governance often bring conflict between institutions and politicians on issues concerning institutional management.This study examined the concepts of higher education governance based on a comparative study of china and Ghana.The study gave special attention to various reforms on governance, higher education autonomy, funding, higher education law and structure of decision making in both countries.This paper argued that, if government limits its influence on higher education governance and higher education institutions are given a significant level of autonomy to make decision on academic program development and appointment of key positions, it will enable the higher education leaders use their expertise to develop high quality higher education.However, it's worth mentioning that, this paper does not argue for governmental absence on higher education governance and management; government will continue with policy formulation on higher education.The comparative study is adopted because, china's higher education has attracted many students from developing countries in Africa and Asia and Ghana as an African country has over ten thousand students pursuing programs at all levels.Higher institutions in Ghana in the past decade have enjoyed good academic relationship with Chinese institutions.Ghana as a middle-income country in the quest to build high quality higher education can learn from the Chinese system.This study will also contribute to literatures in educational governance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Governance in higher education is one key concern for policy makers on restructuring the higher educational systems all over the world.The concepts of higher education governance often bring conflict between institutions and politicians on issues concerning institutional management.This study examined the concepts of higher education governance based on a comparative study of china and Ghana.The study gave special attention to various reforms on governance, higher education autonomy, funding, higher education law and structure of decision making in both countries.This paper argued that, if government limits its influence on higher education governance and higher education institutions are given a significant level of autonomy to make decision on academic program development and appointment of key positions, it will enable the higher education leaders use their expertise to develop high quality higher education.However, it's worth mentioning that, this paper does not argue for governmental absence on higher education governance and management; government will continue with policy formulation on higher education.The comparative study is adopted because, china's higher education has attracted many students from developing countries in Africa and Asia and Ghana as an African country has over ten thousand students pursuing programs at all levels.Higher institutions in Ghana in the past decade have enjoyed good academic relationship with Chinese institutions.Ghana as a middle-income country in the quest to build high quality higher education can learn from the Chinese system.This study will also contribute to literatures in educational governance.

Key concepts: Higher education, Corporate governance, Autonomy, Government (linguistics), China, Economic growth, Restructuring, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Governance in Higher Education: A Comparative Study on Ghana and China — Research Paper | ScholarLens