Analytical Formulas for Conductor-Backed Connected-Ground Coplanar Waveguide
Qun Li, Yonghong Zhang
Abstract
Qun Li, Yonghong Zhang
Abstract
The quasi-static analysis of the conductor-backed connected-ground coplanar waveguide (CBCGCPW) with finite boundary substrate is presented. Analytical closed-form formulas for the capacitance per unit length, characteristic impedance and relative effective permittivity are given by the conformal mapping method. Compared to the coplanar waveguide (CPW) and the conductor-backed coplanar waveguide (CBCPW), the CBCGCPW has equipotential of ground planes and the electromagnetic interference is reduced greatly. The accuracy of analytical formulas is verified through comparisons between the quasi-static and full-wave analysis. Differences between the quasi-static and full-wave analysis results are less than 1% and 5% for the relative effective permittivity and the characteristic impedance, respectively. The analytical formulas can be used in CAD for CBCGCPWs.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The quasi-static analysis of the conductor-backed connected-ground coplanar waveguide (CBCGCPW) with finite boundary substrate is presented. Analytical closed-form formulas for the capacitance per unit length, characteristic impedance and relative effective permittivity are given by the conformal mapping method. Compared to the coplanar waveguide (CPW) and the conductor-backed coplanar waveguide (CBCPW), the CBCGCPW has equipotential of ground planes and the electromagnetic interference is reduced greatly. The accuracy of analytical formulas is verified through comparisons between the quasi-static and full-wave analysis. Differences between the quasi-static and full-wave analysis results are less than 1% and 5% for the relative effective permittivity and the characteristic impedance, respectively. The analytical formulas can be used in CAD for CBCGCPWs.
Key concepts: Coplanar waveguide, Conductor, Conformal map, Ground plane, Relative permittivity, Permittivity, Capacitance, Electrical impedance