2018Journal of Cataract & Refractive SurgeryRequires access

Intraocular lens calculation in post-LASIK eyes using ray tracing with the data from a Placido disk-Scheimpflug tomographer

Paul‐Rolf Preußner

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

In a recent paper, Savini et al.1 compared several intraocular lens (IOL) calculation methods in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis measured with the Galilei G6 device (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG). Among the methods, they found the highest accuracy with Okulix ray-tracing software (Tedics Peric & Jöher GbR). Unfortunately, the authors say in the abstract that the paraxial, not the best-focus, calculation had the highest accuracy. In their tables, however, they use the correct (ie, the best-focus) value. The paraxial refractions of the Okulix are not to be used to show the refractive outcome. They are rather a simple measure of spherical aberration and a quality parameter for the implantation of aspheric IOLs. The higher the difference between paraxial and best-focus refraction, the higher the residual spherical aberration with the selected IOL model. In case of a zero difference, the pseudophakic eye has no spherical aberration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a recent paper, Savini et al.1 compared several intraocular lens (IOL) calculation methods in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis measured with the Galilei G6 device (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG). Among the methods, they found the highest accuracy with Okulix ray-tracing software (Tedics Peric & Jöher GbR). Unfortunately, the authors say in the abstract that the paraxial, not the best-focus, calculation had the highest accuracy. In their tables, however, they use the correct (ie, the best-focus) value. The paraxial refractions of the Okulix are not to be used to show the refractive outcome. They are rather a simple measure of spherical aberration and a quality parameter for the implantation of aspheric IOLs. The higher the difference between paraxial and best-focus refraction, the higher the residual spherical aberration with the selected IOL model. In case of a zero difference, the pseudophakic eye has no spherical aberration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a recent paper, Savini et al.1 compared several intraocular lens (IOL) calculation methods in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis measured with the Galilei G6 device (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG). Among the methods, they found the highest accuracy with Okulix ray-tracing software (Tedics Peric & Jöher GbR). Unfortunately, the authors say in the abstract that the paraxial, not the best-focus, calculation had the highest accuracy. In their tables, however, they use the correct (ie, the best-focus) value. The paraxial refractions of the Okulix are not to be used to show the refractive outcome. They are rather a simple measure of spherical aberration and a quality parameter for the implantation of aspheric IOLs. The higher the difference between paraxial and best-focus refraction, the higher the residual spherical aberration with the selected IOL model. In case of a zero difference, the pseudophakic eye has no spherical aberration.

Key concepts: Paraxial approximation, Scheimpflug principle, Spherical aberration, Ray tracing (physics), Intraocular lens, LASIK, Optics, Keratomileusis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intraocular lens calculation in post-LASIK eyes using ray tracing with the data from a Placido disk-Scheimpflug tomographer — Research Paper | ScholarLens