2018Global Journal of Reproductive MedicineOpen access

Intrauterine Insemination with Fresh Versus Cryopreserved Spermatazoa in Unexplained Infertility

Sheena M. Rippentrop

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In couples with unexplained infertility, intrauterine insemination with fresh, compared to cryopreserved spermatozoa, results in higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In couples with unexplained infertility, intrauterine insemination with fresh, compared to cryopreserved spermatozoa, results in higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In couples with unexplained infertility, intrauterine insemination with fresh, compared to cryopreserved spermatozoa, results in higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.

Key concepts: Intrauterine insemination, Donor insemination, Infertility, Unexplained infertility, Gynecology, Insemination, Cryopreservation, Andrology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intrauterine Insemination with Fresh Versus Cryopreserved Spermatazoa in Unexplained Infertility — Research Paper | ScholarLens