2014Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione ClassicaRequires access

Creating ‘classical’ Greek: from fourth-century practice to Atticist theory

Andreas Willi

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Although it is widely used, the notion of ‘classical’ Greek is not easily defined with precision, since sociolectal, dialectal, and chronological criteria interact in its specification. At first sight, one might hold the Atticist grammarians of the first centuries AD responsible for the ‘classicisation’ of the particular variety of Greek thus labelled. In reality, however, all the Atticists did was codify a development that had begun much earlier, during the initial decades of the fourth century BC, when non-Athenian authors first chose to write in contemporary Attic. Whereas ‘classical’ Greek had thus been synchronically (horizontally) opposed to ‘non-classical’ Greek at the outset, this opposition turned into a diachronic (vertical) one over time; but the selection of the target variety itself remained unaffected by this change in perspective.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although it is widely used, the notion of ‘classical’ Greek is not easily defined with precision, since sociolectal, dialectal, and chronological criteria interact in its specification. At first sight, one might hold the Atticist grammarians of the first centuries AD responsible for the ‘classicisation’ of the particular variety of Greek thus labelled. In reality, however, all the Atticists did was codify a development that had begun much earlier, during the initial decades of the fourth century BC, when non-Athenian authors first chose to write in contemporary Attic. Whereas ‘classical’ Greek had thus been synchronically (horizontally) opposed to ‘non-classical’ Greek at the outset, this opposition turned into a diachronic (vertical) one over time; but the selection of the target variety itself remained unaffected by this change in perspective.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although it is widely used, the notion of ‘classical’ Greek is not easily defined with precision, since sociolectal, dialectal, and chronological criteria interact in its specification. At first sight, one might hold the Atticist grammarians of the first centuries AD responsible for the ‘classicisation’ of the particular variety of Greek thus labelled. In reality, however, all the Atticists did was codify a development that had begun much earlier, during the initial decades of the fourth century BC, when non-Athenian authors first chose to write in contemporary Attic. Whereas ‘classical’ Greek had thus been synchronically (horizontally) opposed to ‘non-classical’ Greek at the outset, this opposition turned into a diachronic (vertical) one over time; but the selection of the target variety itself remained unaffected by this change in perspective.

Key concepts: Variety (cybernetics), Opposition (politics), Ancient Greek, Chose, Perspective (graphical), Sight, Literature, Classics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Creating ‘classical’ Greek: from fourth-century practice to Atticist theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens