2018IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceOpen access

Effect of Sulfate Load on Sulfur Removal in Model Constructed Wetlands

Jiangxin Hou, Wenrui Guo, Yue Wen

Open full text 9 citations

Abstract

Four model constructed wetlands (CWs) were designed to investigate the effects of sulfate load on sulfate and sulfide removal. The results showed that as the sulfate load increased from 1.42 to 7.01 g S m –3 d –1 , the sulfate removal rate increased from 1.42 to 3.16 g S m –3 d –1 , and the sulfide discharge rate increased from 0.08 to 1.46 g S m –3 d –1 . The total sulfur removal rate ranged between 1.29 and 1.74 g S m –3 d –1 . The sulfide in the effluent only accounted for 5.55%–46.9% of the removed sulfate. This indicated that CWs can effectively reduce sulfide discharge while removing sulfate. The conversion of dissolved sulfide into deposited sulfur by CW matrix was a main way for sulfide removal. Elemental sulfur, acid volatile sulfide (AVS), and pyrite-sulfur were the main forms of sulfur deposition in this study. The accumulations of these three sulfur compounds were 16.6–36.2, 22.3–36.0, and 49.7–63.6 mg S kg –1 gravel, respectively. Sulfur balance analysis showed that 42.9%–71.1% of the removed sulfate was deposited in the matrix, and only 0.84%–2.34% was absorbed by the plant.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Four model constructed wetlands (CWs) were designed to investigate the effects of sulfate load on sulfate and sulfide removal. The results showed that as the sulfate load increased from 1.42 to 7.01 g S m –3 d –1 , the sulfate removal rate increased from 1.42 to 3.16 g S m –3 d –1 , and the sulfide discharge rate increased from 0.08 to 1.46 g S m –3 d –1 . The total sulfur removal rate ranged between 1.29 and 1.74 g S m –3 d –1 . The sulfide in the effluent only accounted for 5.55%–46.9% of the removed sulfate. This indicated that CWs can effectively reduce sulfide discharge while removing sulfate. The conversion of dissolved sulfide into deposited sulfur by CW matrix was a main way for sulfide removal. Elemental sulfur, acid volatile sulfide (AVS), and pyrite-sulfur were the main forms of sulfur deposition in this study. The accumulations of these three sulfur compounds were 16.6–36.2, 22.3–36.0, and 49.7–63.6 mg S kg –1 gravel, respectively. Sulfur balance analysis showed that 42.9%–71.1% of the removed sulfate was deposited in the matrix, and only 0.84%–2.34% was absorbed by the plant.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Four model constructed wetlands (CWs) were designed to investigate the effects of sulfate load on sulfate and sulfide removal. The results showed that as the sulfate load increased from 1.42 to 7.01 g S m –3 d –1 , the sulfate removal rate increased from 1.42 to 3.16 g S m –3 d –1 , and the sulfide discharge rate increased from 0.08 to 1.46 g S m –3 d –1 . The total sulfur removal rate ranged between 1.29 and 1.74 g S m –3 d –1 . The sulfide in the effluent only accounted for 5.55%–46.9% of the removed sulfate. This indicated that CWs can effectively reduce sulfide discharge while removing sulfate. The conversion of dissolved sulfide into deposited sulfur by CW matrix was a main way for sulfide removal. Elemental sulfur, acid volatile sulfide (AVS), and pyrite-sulfur were the main forms of sulfur deposition in this study. The accumulations of these three sulfur compounds were 16.6–36.2, 22.3–36.0, and 49.7–63.6 mg S kg –1 gravel, respectively. Sulfur balance analysis showed that 42.9%–71.1% of the removed sulfate was deposited in the matrix, and only 0.84%–2.34% was absorbed by the plant.

Key concepts: Sulfur, Sulfate, Sulfide, Hydrogen sulfide, Chemistry, Pyrite, Environmental chemistry, Inorganic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Sulfate Load on Sulfur Removal in Model Constructed Wetlands — Research Paper | ScholarLens