After the Fall: The Terror of History in Philip Roth's Indignation
Matthew Shipe
Abstract
Matthew Shipe
Abstract
Upon the publication of Indignation in the fall of 2008, reviewers immediately charted the ways in which Philip Roth's new novel revisited the terrain covered in his earliest fiction. While critics were correct to see the novel's resemblance to Goodbye, Columbus (1959) and Portnoy's Complaint (1969), I argue that Indignation more importantly marks a significant shift in Roth's approach to writing about history. This essay explores the implications of this move and suggests how the critique of history that Roth posits in Indignation remains vital to understanding his late work.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Upon the publication of Indignation in the fall of 2008, reviewers immediately charted the ways in which Philip Roth's new novel revisited the terrain covered in his earliest fiction. While critics were correct to see the novel's resemblance to Goodbye, Columbus (1959) and Portnoy's Complaint (1969), I argue that Indignation more importantly marks a significant shift in Roth's approach to writing about history. This essay explores the implications of this move and suggests how the critique of history that Roth posits in Indignation remains vital to understanding his late work.
Key concepts: Indignation, Complaint, Art, History, Literature, Philosophy, Law, Political science