2018ProceedingsRequires access

De-coupling Residual Statics and Velocity Picking

Ali M. Darwish, R. Haacke, Greg Poole

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Summary Land surveys suffer from rapid variations in velocity in the near-surface weathering layer that degrade seismic images when the velocity variations are not accounted for in imaging. While elevation information or refraction tomography can compensate for long and mid-wavelength variations, residual static algorithms are used to correct for the shorter wavelengths. Residual statics are commonly estimated by maximising lateral coherency in gathers after Normal Move-Out corrections, either by measuring trace-to-trace correlation or overall stack power. This work introduces an alternative method able to estimate residual statics using a cost function based on sparseness in gathers without a-priori knowledge about velocities needed for NMO correction. By maximizing sparsity in the tau-v and tau-p domains the method enhances coherency assuming, respectively, hyperbolic reflections in the case of mid-wavelength residual statics and local linearity in the case of shorter wavelength residual statics. Results from 2D and 3D data show overall improvement in stack power and focus, as well as reflector positioning, when the sparseness method is used before picking velocities for imaging. To complete the flow, stack optimisation methods can be run as a post-process to further add constructively to the stack.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary Land surveys suffer from rapid variations in velocity in the near-surface weathering layer that degrade seismic images when the velocity variations are not accounted for in imaging. While elevation information or refraction tomography can compensate for long and mid-wavelength variations, residual static algorithms are used to correct for the shorter wavelengths. Residual statics are commonly estimated by maximising lateral coherency in gathers after Normal Move-Out corrections, either by measuring trace-to-trace correlation or overall stack power. This work introduces an alternative method able to estimate residual statics using a cost function based on sparseness in gathers without a-priori knowledge about velocities needed for NMO correction. By maximizing sparsity in the tau-v and tau-p domains the method enhances coherency assuming, respectively, hyperbolic reflections in the case of mid-wavelength residual statics and local linearity in the case of shorter wavelength residual statics. Results from 2D and 3D data show overall improvement in stack power and focus, as well as reflector positioning, when the sparseness method is used before picking velocities for imaging. To complete the flow, stack optimisation methods can be run as a post-process to further add constructively to the stack.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary Land surveys suffer from rapid variations in velocity in the near-surface weathering layer that degrade seismic images when the velocity variations are not accounted for in imaging. While elevation information or refraction tomography can compensate for long and mid-wavelength variations, residual static algorithms are used to correct for the shorter wavelengths. Residual statics are commonly estimated by maximising lateral coherency in gathers after Normal Move-Out corrections, either by measuring trace-to-trace correlation or overall stack power. This work introduces an alternative method able to estimate residual statics using a cost function based on sparseness in gathers without a-priori knowledge about velocities needed for NMO correction. By maximizing sparsity in the tau-v and tau-p domains the method enhances coherency assuming, respectively, hyperbolic reflections in the case of mid-wavelength residual statics and local linearity in the case of shorter wavelength residual statics. Results from 2D and 3D data show overall improvement in stack power and focus, as well as reflector positioning, when the sparseness method is used before picking velocities for imaging. To complete the flow, stack optimisation methods can be run as a post-process to further add constructively to the stack.

Key concepts: Statics, Residual, Stack (abstract data type), Wavelength, A priori and a posteriori, Geology, Algorithm, Reflector (photography)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
De-coupling Residual Statics and Velocity Picking — Research Paper | ScholarLens