2017Artistic Culture Topical IssuesOpen access

«Ekranocentrism» of contemporary art: Theory of research and art practice

Iryna Zubavina

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The article is devoted to the actual problem of studying in diachronic measure of the mutual influ­ence of the theory of cinema and creative practice of filming. In the socio-historical retrospection, a dynamic search for the art of the screen of its authenticity, the stages of formation of the corresponding theoretical basis, and its own scientific discourse are considered. The article emphasizes the intensification of the mutual influence of the theory and practice of filming at the points of transformation of the cultural code, marked by the emergence of «bifurcation» cinema avant-garde, with a radical change in the film model in the 1920s and 1930s, its partial transformation in the 1950s–1960s and 1980s–1990s. The potential of the influence of theoretical thought on the development of the film process in the coordinates of the industrial, and subse­ quently by the post-industrial society, where the artistic work becomes a product, is determined.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The article is devoted to the actual problem of studying in diachronic measure of the mutual influ­ence of the theory of cinema and creative practice of filming. In the socio-historical retrospection, a dynamic search for the art of the screen of its authenticity, the stages of formation of the corresponding theoretical basis, and its own scientific discourse are considered. The article emphasizes the intensification of the mutual influence of the theory and practice of filming at the points of transformation of the cultural code, marked by the emergence of «bifurcation» cinema avant-garde, with a radical change in the film model in the 1920s and 1930s, its partial transformation in the 1950s–1960s and 1980s–1990s. The potential of the influence of theoretical thought on the development of the film process in the coordinates of the industrial, and subse­ quently by the post-industrial society, where the artistic work becomes a product, is determined.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The article is devoted to the actual problem of studying in diachronic measure of the mutual influ­ence of the theory of cinema and creative practice of filming. In the socio-historical retrospection, a dynamic search for the art of the screen of its authenticity, the stages of formation of the corresponding theoretical basis, and its own scientific discourse are considered. The article emphasizes the intensification of the mutual influence of the theory and practice of filming at the points of transformation of the cultural code, marked by the emergence of «bifurcation» cinema avant-garde, with a radical change in the film model in the 1920s and 1930s, its partial transformation in the 1950s–1960s and 1980s–1990s. The potential of the influence of theoretical thought on the development of the film process in the coordinates of the industrial, and subse­ quently by the post-industrial society, where the artistic work becomes a product, is determined.

Key concepts: Movie theater, Transformation (genetics), Epistemology, Product (mathematics), Process (computing), Sociology, Architecture, Aesthetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
«Ekranocentrism» of contemporary art: Theory of research and art practice — Research Paper | ScholarLens