2018British Journal of DermatologyRequires access

Definition of psoriasis severity in routine clinical care: current guidelines fail to capture the complexity of long-term psoriasis management

Matthias Augustin, Anna Katharina Langenbruch, Mandy Gutknecht, Kristian Reich, Andreas Körber, Dirk Maaßen, Ulrich Mrowietz, Diamant Thaçi, Ralph von Kiedrowski, Marc Alexander Radtke

Open publisher page 38 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessment of disease severity is an essential component of psoriasis management. Moderate-to-severe disease qualifies for systemic treatment but different definitions are used. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the impact of different severity definitions for psoriasis in real-world healthcare. METHODS: Cross-sectional data on 3274 patients with psoriasis from more than 200 dermatology offices and clinics across Germany were analysed for disease severity based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The proportions of patients having moderate-to-severe disease were determined accordingly. RESULTS: The proportion of patients meeting the European consensus criteria for moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PASI AND DLQI > 10) was 14·0%, although 45·3% attained at least PASI OR DLQI > 10. Consideration of all patients on systemic drugs as being 'moderate-to-severe' increased these proportions to 56·9% and 75·2%, respectively. When only PASI > 10 was used, moderate-to-severe disease affected 35·3% and 69·3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with psoriasis under dermatological care considered to have moderate-to-severe disease varies considerably according to how the latter is defined, resulting in uncertainty and inequity of access to systemic therapy. We propose an international standardisation in this for the sake of more reliable treatment and healthcare planning.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Assessment of disease severity is an essential component of psoriasis management. Moderate-to-severe disease qualifies for systemic treatment but different definitions are used. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the impact of different severity definitions for psoriasis in real-world healthcare. METHODS: Cross-sectional data on 3274 patients with psoriasis from more than 200 dermatology offices and clinics across Germany were analysed for disease severity based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The proportions of patients having moderate-to-severe disease were determined accordingly. RESULTS: The proportion of patients meeting the European consensus criteria for moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PASI AND DLQI > 10) was 14·0%, although 45·3% attained at least PASI OR DLQI > 10. Consideration of all patients on systemic drugs as being 'moderate-to-severe' increased these proportions to 56·9% and 75·2%, respectively. When only PASI > 10 was used, moderate-to-severe disease affected 35·3% and 69·3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with psoriasis under dermatological care considered to have moderate-to-severe disease varies considerably according to how the latter is defined, resulting in uncertainty and inequity of access to systemic therapy. We propose an international standardisation in this for the sake of more reliable treatment and healthcare planning.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessment of disease severity is an essential component of psoriasis management. Moderate-to-severe disease qualifies for systemic treatment but different definitions are used. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the impact of different severity definitions for psoriasis in real-world healthcare. METHODS: Cross-sectional data on 3274 patients with psoriasis from more than 200 dermatology offices and clinics across Germany were analysed for disease severity based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The proportions of patients having moderate-to-severe disease were determined accordingly. RESULTS: The proportion of patients meeting the European consensus criteria for moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PASI AND DLQI > 10) was 14·0%, although 45·3% attained at least PASI OR DLQI > 10. Consideration of all patients on systemic drugs as being 'moderate-to-severe' increased these proportions to 56·9% and 75·2%, respectively. When only PASI > 10 was used, moderate-to-severe disease affected 35·3% and 69·3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with psoriasis under dermatological care considered to have moderate-to-severe disease varies considerably according to how the latter is defined, resulting in uncertainty and inequity of access to systemic therapy. We propose an international standardisation in this for the sake of more reliable treatment and healthcare planning.

Key concepts: Psoriasis, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Medicine, Severity of illness, Disease, Quality of life (healthcare), Dermatology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Definition of psoriasis severity in routine clinical care: current guidelines fail to capture the complexity of long-term psoriasis management — Research Paper | ScholarLens