2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Paternalism and the practitioner/patient relationship

Emma C. Bullock

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Medical paternalism typically involves a medical practitioner interfering with a patient’s choices regarding her medical treatment for the sake of protecting or promoting that patient’s best interests. Although medical paternalism has been historically pervasive, concern over the importance of respecting patient autonomy in both ethics and law has led to a widespread rejection of medical paternalism in western medical ethics. In this chapter Emma C. Bullock provides an overview of the recent move away from medical paternalism before presenting two broad motivations for returning to a more paternalistic model in therapeutic practice: medical paternalism can be motivated out of an interest in protecting patient well-being or via considerations of the limits of patient autonomy. Despite these motivations Bullock outlines reasons to be cautious about readopting a paternalistic relationship between practitioner and patient.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Medical paternalism typically involves a medical practitioner interfering with a patient’s choices regarding her medical treatment for the sake of protecting or promoting that patient’s best interests. Although medical paternalism has been historically pervasive, concern over the importance of respecting patient autonomy in both ethics and law has led to a widespread rejection of medical paternalism in western medical ethics. In this chapter Emma C. Bullock provides an overview of the recent move away from medical paternalism before presenting two broad motivations for returning to a more paternalistic model in therapeutic practice: medical paternalism can be motivated out of an interest in protecting patient well-being or via considerations of the limits of patient autonomy. Despite these motivations Bullock outlines reasons to be cautious about readopting a paternalistic relationship between practitioner and patient.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Medical paternalism typically involves a medical practitioner interfering with a patient’s choices regarding her medical treatment for the sake of protecting or promoting that patient’s best interests. Although medical paternalism has been historically pervasive, concern over the importance of respecting patient autonomy in both ethics and law has led to a widespread rejection of medical paternalism in western medical ethics. In this chapter Emma C. Bullock provides an overview of the recent move away from medical paternalism before presenting two broad motivations for returning to a more paternalistic model in therapeutic practice: medical paternalism can be motivated out of an interest in protecting patient well-being or via considerations of the limits of patient autonomy. Despite these motivations Bullock outlines reasons to be cautious about readopting a paternalistic relationship between practitioner and patient.

Key concepts: Paternalism, Autonomy, Medical ethics, Personal autonomy, Medical practice, Medicine, Psychology, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Paternalism and the practitioner/patient relationship — Research Paper | ScholarLens